I enjoyed the UF but have noticed a worrying trend. I was researching articles and came across this thread http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1210639&page=3. It seems administrators have the right to decide what is right and wrong to the extent that the freedom of the forum itself is at risk. It is decided I cannot even comment on what was posted and thus this new thread. If I want to delete or corrupt my hard drive etc on purpose for the sake of research and further protection and development of a system why is this forum excluding it? I realize there is a fine line that a new user could be exposed to something dangerous but so what? Is that not the purpose of the sub categories of the forums? Go to the great guru rms`s site and see his opinions on this. Open source is the freedom to do it all again if you mess up (and believe me I do on a regular basis)with no cost and thus to learn (even if it is the hard way) as you go along. If a member posts a thread "this is how to corrupt your hard drive" and give a code then he or she is not being subversive they are giving me the opportunity to do so. A member has been banned for life and I doubt he was subversive as he still tried to explain his point and wanted back in to the forums.(no I do not know member) Sure monitoring is necessary to ensure a forum stays on track and such things as language use etc are controlled. A culture of fear has been instilled on us as a society in recent years and seems to be spilling over into this forum. Please feel free to comment - if you are allowed to.
Bookmarks