https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/oracu...se-notes/44878 ... but seems just a copy of Noble Numbat Release Notes
I'm setting this one out due to We are reintroducing support for ZFS guided installations, enhancing the flexibility and choices available for your storage management needs. This is a new implementation in the Subiquity-based installers, and is without encryption by default. The encrypted ZFS guided option will be developed in a future release. And did I read correctly: Known limitations: Requires TPM 2.0. Only a limited set of hardware is supported. No external kernel-modules support. For example, no support of NVIDIA graphics cards. I don't remember seeing that On Noble -release-notes.
One of the nice things about Ubuntu Discourse is that you get to see actions in progress. Including the incomplete release notes as it gets pecked at by various engineers.
Originally Posted by 1fallen I'm setting this one out due to We are reintroducing support for ZFS guided installations, enhancing the flexibility and choices available for your storage management needs. This is a new implementation in the Subiquity-based installers, and is without encryption by default. The encrypted ZFS guided option will be developed in a future release. And did I read correctly: Known limitations: Requires TPM 2.0. Only a limited set of hardware is supported. No external kernel-modules support. For example, no support of NVIDIA graphics cards. I don't remember seeing that On Noble -release-notes. Wait a minute... That way those are worded... #1) "subiquity". That would imply that they are adding a ZFS option to the Server Edition installer(?) Desktop has been flutter since Lunar. #2) Requiring TPM 2.0 backed encryption was a disaster with the ubuntu-desktop-installer. I can't remember if that was Mantic or Noble. (Will have to check my notes.) It was so bad, with my bug reports that they pulled it. #3) No external Modules??? How is that going to even work? I'm pushing ZFS, BUT... Doesn't saying no external modules conflict with their push for ZFS? (Devil's advocate). #4) No NVidia... I will not comment on that, but that alone, is big. Curious to see how this goes, and what it means.
Last edited by MAFoElffen; May 8th, 2024 at 03:59 AM.
"Concurrent coexistence of Windows, Linux and UNIX..." || Ubuntu user # 33563, Linux user # 533637 Sticky: Graphics Resolution | UbuntuForums 'system-info' Script | Posting Guidelines | Code Tags
Originally Posted by corradoventu https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/oracu...se-notes/44878 ... but seems just a copy of Noble Numbat Release Notes Looks like they just did a Code: $sed 's/Noble/Oracular/' release-notes.txt , but forgot the title. I've messaged the author on Discourse about that last bit.
$sed 's/Noble/Oracular/' release-notes.txt
Ryzen 9 7950X3D / NZXT Kraken Z63 / Gigabyte X670E Aorus Pro X / 64GB 6000mT/s C36 Kingston Fury Beast / Gigabyte RTX4080 Aero OC / 1TB Samsung 970 Evo / Asus Loki 1kW / Lian-Li O11D Mini / Samsung Odyssey G9 Neo / Win11 / Kubuntu 24.10
Originally Posted by MAFoElffen Wait a minute... That way those are worded... #1) "subiquity". That would imply that they are adding a ZFS option to the Server Edition installer(?) Desktop has been flutter since Lunar. #2) Requiring TPM 2.0 backed encryption was a disaster with the ubuntu-desktop-installer. I can't remember if that was Mantic or Noble. (Will have to check my notes.) It was so bad, with my bug reports that they pulled it. #3) No external Modules??? How is that going to even work? I'm pushing ZFS, BUT... Doesn't saying no external modules conflict with their push for ZFS? (Devil's advocate). #4) No NVidia... I will not comment on that, but that alone, is big. Curious to see how this goes, and what it means. I too am very curious how all this shakes out.
Ran what was just a 143 or so package upgrade to oracular by editing the sources.list data . . . from "noble"?? to "oracular" . . . . On reboot all appears to be running fine on my '12 Mac pro with Nvidia 780?? card. I run "nouveau" rather than proprietary . . . . So far so good.
Ubuntu Forums Code of Conduct