Re: Popularity of OGG
Originally Posted by
cascade9
IMO, its a few things-
Confusion- See, its not '.ogg'. That is just a container format. 'vorbis' is what you mean.
Compatibility- not just for MP3 players, but also the standard media players in windows (WMP) and apple (iTunes) dont support vorbis out of the box.
Features- .ogg had pretty horrible album art support, etc. MP3 album art is still pretty much a 'hack' but it works better than artwork in vorbis comments.
Misinformation- I know lots of people who 'tried ogg vorbis and gave it up' because of what they had heard about it before they tried it. Most commonly, thats because it didnt sound as good as what they thought/wanted.
Mostly thats because they had heard that 'vorbis sounds better' and wanted to get away with using a far smaller bitrate than they would with MP3. Sorry, vorbis might be better sound quality, but when you compare 192k CBR MP3 with 128k vorbis, MP3 will normally win.
Lossless- .flac (and to a less extent .wv and .ape) have taken over a lot of the userbase that would have used vorbis. Helped along by the rise and rise of Hdd sizes. When you have 1TB+ Hdds around, ripping to flac looks far more attractive than any lossy codec.
agreed but how about downloading?
flac roughly takes thrice the size of ogg. i have ~100 mbps connection but it has its quota, for example.
When the seagulls follow the trawler, it is because they think sardines will be thrown into the sea.
Bookmarks