Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 31

Thread: Foobar2000 alternative

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Beans
    50

    Foobar2000 alternative

    Hi there.

    Back when I was running windows, I had a wonderful little program called Foobar, It was able to stream music from my home server (where I keep all my mp3s). I was trying to find an alternative for Ubuntu, a small media player that can keep an index of all the mp3 files on the slimserver, and stream them straight to my speakers.
    I quite like the set up of rhythmbox, especially the cover art display, is rhythmbox able to look at directories on a LAN?

    Thanks.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Beans
    9

    Re: Foobar2000 alternative

    Quote Originally Posted by Jophish View Post
    I was trying to find an alternative for Ubuntu, a small media player that can keep an index of all the mp3 files on the slimserver, and stream them straight to my speakers.
    i missed foobar too after switching to linux, amarok is nice but a bit resource heavy for my old pc
    personally i use mpd (music player daemon) and sonata as the frontend

    you could have a look at gmusicbrowser, from what i hear it comes reasonably close to foobar

    Quote Originally Posted by Jophish View Post
    I quite like the set up of rhythmbox, especially the cover art display, is rhythmbox able to look at directories on a LAN?
    Thanks.
    can't think of a reason why it wouldn't work with mounted samba/nfs shares
    you can find a howto for mounting samba (windows) shares here: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=280473

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Beans
    50

    Re: Foobar2000 alternative

    I managed to mount my server to a folder in my profile, however in order to do this every time, I think i need to edit fstab.
    Hows this:
    Code:
    # /etc/fstab: static file system information.
    #
    # <file system> <mount point>   <type>  <options>       <dump>  <pass>
    proc            /proc           proc    defaults        0       0
    # /dev/sda2
    UUID=190eba17-6492-49fe-a8b4-f3b956987e3f /               ext2    relatime,errors=remount-ro 0       1
    # /dev/sda5
    UUID=dbcdadc2-fbbe-4b82-ac0e-ad963b53ec15 none            swap    sw              0       0
    /dev/scd0       /media/cdrom0   udf,iso9660 user,noauto,exec,utf8 0       0
    /dev/fd0        /media/floppy0  auto    rw,user,noauto,exec,utf8 0       0
    #Music folders
    //192.168.0.10/Public/music /home/jophish/Music smbfs auto 0 0
    Last edited by Jophish; June 14th, 2008 at 05:54 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Beans
    50

    Re: Foobar2000 alternative

    I got the fstab to work ok, However gmusicbrowser was not able to play any music, as I can't set the volume to anything but -1. It claims that I am missing alsa-utils, although I have this, and have reinstalled. I can hear music everywhere else though.
    Another thing, gmusicbrowser doesn't seem to quite cut it with 130,000+ songs on my database, Is there a different application that can handle this many songs?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Beans
    2,052

    Re: Foobar2000 alternative

    i'm surprised no one has mentioned yet that foobar2000 works virtually perfectly with wine.

    i use audacious myself though.
    Linux User #440528
    openSUSE 12.1 x86_64/KDE 4.8.4

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Southeast Corner of Texas
    Beans
    51
    Distro
    Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty Jackalope

    Re: Foobar2000 alternative

    Have a look at AMPACHE, it works great over my wireless LAN.
    Jim Hayes
    TexasJim

    UPNUG

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Beans
    50

    Re: Foobar2000 alternative

    I have since discovered Amarok, It seems to be working quite well, and I like the interface (just wish that the icons came in orange though).

    Thanks anyway guys.

    Also, If anyone reading this knows about configuring drivers for graphics cards, please take a look at this thread here: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=5183776
    I need all the help I can get with it.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Beans
    99

    Re: Foobar2000 alternative

    I was about to mention Amarok. As an ex-Foobar2000 user myself, Amarok took a bit of getting used to, but it really is a very, very good program.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Seattle
    Beans
    348
    Distro
    Ubuntu 14.10 Utopic Unicorn

    Re: Foobar2000 alternative

    Quote Originally Posted by mccord View Post
    you could have a look at gmusicbrowser, from what i hear it comes reasonably close to foobar
    I have tried just about every audio player for Ubuntu and this is by far the best I have found. Especially if you have lots of music, this is the easiest for organization, it also has a mass renaming option to. Real good program. It has a few visual bugs, but nothing that would stop me from using it. I definitely recommend this!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Odense, dk
    Beans
    Hidden!
    Distro
    Ubuntu 14.04 Trusty Tahr

    Re: Foobar2000 alternative

    vlc

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •