Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 47

Thread: Which is faster: Heron vs. XP?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Beans
    23

    Which is faster: Heron vs. XP?

    I currently have 256mb of RAM and a 1.7GHz processor, and I plan on installing Ubuntu 8.04. Would Ubuntu still run fast on my PC?

    And is Xubuntu really as ugly as I heard some folks say?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Massachusetts, USA
    Beans
    1,578
    Distro
    Xubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat

    Re: Which is faster: Heron vs. XP?

    You should get the Ubuntu LiveCD and see if it'll even load up with 256MB of RAM. You might be just at the cusp there for Gnome. The processor is fast enough, and if you added some more memory then you wouldn't have any issues.

    In general, Linux is fast enough for most people and their needs..
    Registered Linux User #446796
    Registered Ubuntu User #13489

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    $ pwd _
    Beans
    3,999
    Distro
    Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal

    Re: Which is faster: Heron vs. XP?

    With that RAM, ubuntu might be bit slower. Perhaps upgrade RAM to atleast 512 MB if you wish to install ubuntu.

    With 256 MB of RAM, xubuntu will perform better than ubuntu.

    http://www.xfce-look.org should give you some idea how xubuntu can be made to look (awesome)

    EDIT: You would need alternate CD ISO (not the regular desktop Live ISO) to successfully install with 256 MB ram.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Beans
    291
    Distro
    Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot

    Re: Which is faster: Heron vs. XP?

    xubuntu doesn't look bad at all
    it's slightly similar to ubuntu's theme.
    and it runs great so you shouldn't have any problems

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Beans
    3,475
    Distro
    Ubuntu 12.04 Precise Pangolin

    Re: Which is faster: Heron vs. XP?

    Gutsy Gibbon and Hardy Heron both need a minimum of 384mb of ram according to documentation i read. Feisty Fawn and earlier would work with 256mb of ram. Use xubuntu.
    Windows is the best virus detector on the market!
    Ubuntu attracts Human Beings - Windows attracts viruses and worms

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    ~
    Beans
    314
    Distro
    Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx

    Re: Which is faster: Heron vs. XP?

    heron will be faster....

    but u should install from the alternate cd instead of the live cd

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Beans
    132

    Re: Which is faster: Heron vs. XP?

    To have tried both with a similar configuration I would say that XP and Ubuntu will run about the same speed at the beginning (they both would need more RAM). The big difference will or course be that on ubuntu you wont need anti spyware & anti virus. Your XP will become really slow really fast but ubuntu will stay about the same speed for a long time.

    I never tried xubuntu but it seems not as bad as you say... may be xubuntu would be worth giving a try....

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Alexandria
    Beans
    1,202
    Distro
    Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala

    Re: Which is faster: Heron vs. XP?

    Don't try ubuntu 8.04 with this size of ram , may be it'll not boot at all. try xubuntu live cd first before installing.
    Linux user #434738 - Ubuntu user #9391
    Be happy .....think of others and thank GOD.

    Kindly mark your thread [SOLVED] if it is done.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    $ pwd _
    Beans
    3,999
    Distro
    Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal

    Re: Which is faster: Heron vs. XP?

    Quote Originally Posted by housam View Post
    Don't try ubuntu 8.04 with this size of ram , may be it'll not boot at all. try xubuntu live cd first before installing.
    xubuntu live CD won't run with 256 MB RAM, I'm afraid. The only option for the OP is to use the ISO for alternate CD.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Beans
    2,803
    Distro
    Ubuntu Development Release

    Re: Which is faster: Heron vs. XP?

    Quote Originally Posted by kpkeerthi View Post
    xubuntu live CD won't run with 256 MB RAM, I'm afraid. The only option for the OP is to use the ISO for alternate CD.
    Xubuntu can't either?
    I swear, Xubuntu could run on 128MB before.


    Basically it wont run well because, in simple words. Ubuntu is full of crap as standard.

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •