Site Discussion Title

[matthew]

He is talking about the one on the main forum page. Nothing has been changed azz.

Oh, that's what this thread is talking about...I thought it was talking about this. How silly of me.

[TravisNewman]

in all fairness, rudeness is abound in this thread, not just from jdodson.

I agree, however, that clarification would be quite beneficial.

[jdong]

Clarification will happen. Ryan and I have already discussed through this. Thanks for bringing it up, though many of the comments you guys have made are unnecessary and simply rude.

[jdong]

*UPDATE*: The descriptive message users will see is now a bit more descriptive.

[matthew]

*UPDATE*: Message now a bit more descriptive. Happy?

I think that is well worded.

[TravisNewman]

I think that is well worded.

word. That's very descriptive.

[az]

*UPDATE*: The descriptive message users will see is now a bit more descriptive.

English rocks!

[jdodson]

Hmmm, well I was not trying to be rude. I just thought it was odd that ubuntu-geek used the definition to clear up the topic. As if that was the answer. I might not have posed my question well enough, but I know what unwanted is.

And this does not have anything to do with me stepping down as a moderator, it is something I have thought about for sometime, and decided to say something about it. My first post was far from rude, I just decided to say something about it now, interpret it how you wish.

Anyways in the end it was changed, so I might have been right about something. I was not trying to bash, just point out something. The forums are about clarity no? Well, lets rock clarity.

[kassetra]

English rocks!

Ack. That was my doing late last night. It made sense at the time.

How about, "The tag under the the forum title is now more descriptive."

[az]

Ack. That was my doing late last night. It made sense at the time.

How about, "The tag under the the forum title is now more descriptive."

Damn Heineken!