Dear Ubuntufolk:
Can Linux ever displace Windows?
Here's what I found in using Linux:
Under Ubuntu Feisty (Gnome), when I had defined multiple desktops the taskbar crashed occasionally on boot, forcing a reboot. I posted a bug, but gave up when I had to install trace software but didn't understand the scripting conventions.
Installing the driver for a pcmcia card modem required communication with several PhD Linux experts.
I could never install FAX services. This required communication with several PhD experts in Linux but the instructions were over my head--and I'm not dense.
I changed to Kubuntu
First of all, on installing KDE and deinstalling Gnome, the multiple keyboard feature did not work and I had to do a clean Kubuntu install.
Still no FAX.
On Kubuntu, on the KDE desktop, the desktop icons wander on boot unless I use a reduced set and they are placed just so.
On Kubutu Kweather doesn't work.
I have not been able to make head or tail of how to install wireless drivers for the Internet for any version of Ubuntu. I went to the guide forum but I couldn't follow the instructions given the two cards I have--either the card wasn't listed or the instructions were beyond my comprehension.
On Kubuntu, occasionally my screen goes blank and I have to reboot--I don't have a keyboard or anything when the screen goes blank. On the forums I noticed that someone had the same problem with Ubuntu and that it probably had something to do with an overheating processor--but I run Linux at low CPU speed to save power and I have never had this problem either with Ubuntu or with Windows: that would suggest to me a software bug in Kubuntu (i.e. KDE).
Neither the Ubuntu nor the Kubuntu Gutsy Live CD works.
I believe that I have posted questions about all of these matters on the forums, and to most of these problems I haven't even received a reply.
For the most part, all of the above problems either are solved virtually automatically in Windows XP Pro (e.g. FAX services, pcmcia modem and wireless drivers) or don't exist (e.g. blank screens, non-functional applets).
I just don't have the level of problem that I have with Linux with Windows XP Pro on a dual boot machine.
This is not to say that Windows is perfect, but it is to say that in my experience--much to my surprise--it has a higher level of reliability than Linux AT THE LEVEL OF THE USER INTERFACE.
Linux is interesting to me theoretically as an alternative and it is practically useful in my particular situation because it gives me control over power consumption where XP doesn't--but if my experience with Linux is any indication, shouldn't people who have senior positions in the Linux community give serious thought to the useability and reliability of Linux?
Moreover, if we are to escape the Microsoft development model of larger and more bloated operating systems (2000 > XP > Vista), the only alternatives are to go to Linux or to Apple. But with this level of user difficulties with Linux, how can Linux possibly make a serious dent in Windows' market share? And for the privilege of using the aristocrat of computers, the Apple, you pay an aristocratic sum.
Whatawonderfulday
Bookmarks