Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: 10.2 or 10.3?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Beans
    80

    10.2 or 10.3?

    I´ve make my mind and finally decided to make a spare partition and install OpenSuse there. My question is: Regarding 10.3 is a version released not too far ago in the past, is it stable enough to install it on a production box? Im asking this because i´ve had the same problems with Gutsy: downloaded the "stable" release that came up 18 october but it was still too buggy for me. So, should i download new 10.3 or stick with stable 10.2?

    Another question: i´ve read a bunch of reviews and all of them seem to agree on one thing: opensuse 10.3 gnome version is clunky, slower than the kde version. I downloaded some weeks ago the Gnome iso, installed it and, in fact, it was slow (on a P4 3.0 Ghz, 1GB ram, no DRI enabled). Does someone have experienced the KDE version? How did it feel?

    Regards

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Beans
    Hidden!
    Distro
    Kubuntu 7.10 Gutsy Gibbon

    Re: 10.2 or 10.3?

    Hi, no 10.3 when I used it a week ago was not stable if u want 32 effects for example if u install compiz fusion u get a white cube and u need to disable XGL and stuff, I suggest u get OpenSuse 10.2.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Beans
    80

    Re: 10.2 or 10.3?

    aren´t 10.2 features more slow thanl 10.3? Thats only according to some reviews i read. Please someone confirm this. I know 10.2 is rock solid compared to 10.3 but im willing to sacrifice some stability in pos of more "polished" features

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    /usr/share/beer
    Beans
    1,316
    Distro
    Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx

    Re: 10.2 or 10.3?

    Not any of the openSuSE releases are rated as production or mission critical OSs... Only SLED & SLES are rated that way...

    If you like SuSE and want stable, SuSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10, SP1 on the desktop and SLES 10 on a production server.

    10.3 is nice, polished, down right beautiful, however, as mentioned in certain areas kind of unstable. 10.2 was just slllloooow. I'm still waiting for YaST to open the software management app from nine months ago.... Updates in 10.2 took forever. The enterprise versions (SLES & SLED) use a different mechanism to get security & other updates.

    Registered Linux User #419773, Ubuntu User #8473 ("It Is What It Is")

    If you type rm -Rf / as root at command line you will get herpes... then die... (okay, it'll erase ALL your data)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    The Realm of Choice
    Beans
    883

    Re: 10.2 or 10.3?

    Quote Originally Posted by dca View Post
    Not any of the openSuSE releases are rated as production or mission critical OSs... Only SLED & SLES are rated that way...

    If you like SuSE and want stable, SuSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10, SP1 on the desktop and SLES 10 on a production server.

    10.3 is nice, polished, down right beautiful, however, as mentioned in certain areas kind of unstable. 10.2 was just slllloooow. I'm still waiting for YaST to open the software management app from nine months ago.... Updates in 10.2 took forever. The enterprise versions (SLES & SLED) use a different mechanism to get security & other updates.
    Hmmm.. I never even looked at SLED as an option before. I wonder how it rates against the Open version as far as features. Gonna download the demo now.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Bucharest, Romania
    Beans
    1,427
    Distro
    Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx

    Re: 10.2 or 10.3?

    definitely opensuse 10.3. yast is much faster and all the apps are up-to-date
    The limits of my language mean the limits of my world

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    /usr/share/beer
    Beans
    1,316
    Distro
    Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx

    Re: 10.2 or 10.3?

    SLED10 SP1 is $50 USD direct from Novell. Same as open, more stable and no server packages included.

    Registered Linux User #419773, Ubuntu User #8473 ("It Is What It Is")

    If you type rm -Rf / as root at command line you will get herpes... then die... (okay, it'll erase ALL your data)

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    The Realm of Choice
    Beans
    883

    Re: 10.2 or 10.3?

    Quote Originally Posted by dca View Post
    SLED10 SP1 is $50 USD direct from Novell. Same as open, more stable and no server packages included.
    Trying it out on my main desktop now. So far Banshee found and connected to my IPOD without a hitch, HP PSC1400 connected and working (including scanner). I will need to tweak some things, but I'll see how it goes.
    Last edited by Antman; October 26th, 2007 at 09:38 PM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Vermont
    Beans
    869
    Distro
    Ubuntu

    Re: 10.2 or 10.3?

    10.2 is ridiculously slow compared to 10.3. 10.3 is alot faster and more up to date programs are included.
    Desktop: Windows 8 x64 | Intel Core i5-2500 | 16 GB DDR3 1333 | ATI 6950 2gb | 64gb Vertex 2/320gb/750gb/1tb hdd
    Laptop: System76 Lemur Ultra | Xubuntu 13.04 x64 | 2.5Ghz Intel Core i5-3210m | 8GB DDR31600 | Intel HD4000 | 500GB 7200rpm hybrid hdd

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •