For my 2 pennies worth, KDE is more interesting than Gnome - Gnome just seems a bit dumb and a bit dull. As for the number of menus - I have one, with sections for graphics, internet etc - not actually very complicated and it's a bog standard install.
Anyway, it's all opinion and this debate will go on longer than time itself.
Macbook and Ubuntu 12.04
Macbook and Ubuntu 12.04
I use ubuntu because I like gnome much more than kde
The limits of my language mean the limits of my world
GNOME is what I use right now, but some how KDE keeps me interested all the time. With the preview of KDE4, the urge is more than ever.
[Arch + KDE]
Don't these two kinda contradict each other, if yo care about how a menu looks quote 2 is invalid, otherwise quote 1 is.
But 5 minutes in KMenuEdit can make the menu as good as you want it so none of that matters really. I live having a section for each group (Graphics, internet, Multimedia) so I suppose by that logic I must sit staring at my menu all day
No offense to anybody but Kubuntu is the slowest distro I've ever tried!
I don't think it integrates KDE all that great either. I find that running KDE is much faster if I just install it like this:
Code:Sudo apt-get install kdm kde-core
Ubuntu, because I had only heard of it. When I found out about Kubuntu and tried, well, I realized that I cannot stand KDE.
Bookmarks