View Poll Results: What is the best desktop in your opinion?

Voters
315. You may not vote on this poll
  • Gnome

    182 57.78%
  • KDE

    86 27.30%
  • Xfce

    47 14.92%
Page 187 of 231 FirstFirst ... 87137177185186187188189197 ... LastLast
Results 1,861 to 1,870 of 2301

Thread: Desktop Environment / Window Manager Preference/Comparison Thread

  1. #1861
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Lebanon
    Beans
    181
    Distro
    Gutsy Gibbon Testing

    Re: KDE Why is it supposed to be so great?

    Talking about KDE, well i love Konqueror and its multi functionality, Ctrl+T for a new TAB, Amarok is the best music player for me ever, yakuake the sweetest terminal emulator, Kopete for messenging, k3b for buring cds (and more)..

    actually i also love gnome, i find it more robust and user friendly, but KDE has so many cool features...
    Ubuntu 7.10 Gutsy - Laptop: F-S Amilo M-1437 - Everything working (only the modem is not!)-
    Linux registered user # 438061 | Ubuntu registered user # 10651

  2. #1862
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Toronto
    Beans
    479

    Re: KDE Why is it supposed to be so great?

    Linus says kde is more configurable than gnome. I don't really see the huzzah.

  3. #1863
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    bd
    Beans
    54
    Distro
    Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx

    Re: Gnome vs. KDE (includes Linus Torvalds)

    Hello
    I was a KDE user (on Slackware, its still one of the best distros). After installing Ubuntu gnome is my first choice for the moment. But I can surely say managing/copying/browsing files/folder takes lot less time in KDE.

  4. #1864
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Milton Keynes, UK
    Beans
    58
    Distro
    Ubuntu 13.04 Raring Ringtail

    Re: Gnome vs. KDE (includes Linus Torvalds)

    I prefer Fluxbox over Gnome and KDE, simply because I enjoy being able to make my desktop gui look exactly the way I want (and use the CLI for actual work). However, I do more server side work in linux and dont often get to see my gui these days anyway - generally I just remote in from whatever station or computer Im on.
    I have to agree with the comments being made about KDE being too 'Windows' like, just as Gnome is too 'Mac' like. I would pick Gnome out of the two simply because it feels more comfortable to work in (very reminiscent of the Ubuntu philosophy) and it feels less like Im logged onto a Microsoft product.
    I will plunge you into a nightmare world from which there is no awakening. In a lol way.

  5. #1865
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, AL
    Beans
    14
    Distro
    Kubuntu 6.10 Edgy

    Re: Gnome vs. KDE (includes Linus Torvalds)

    one thing that keeps me on KDE is the configurability of the desktop.

    Nice transparent taskbar:
    Right click on the taskbar, select "configure panel" then click on "appearance", then click the box "enable transaprency".

    Desktop widgets (weather, sensor monitors, cpu/memory usage, etc..):
    $ sudo aptitude install superkaramba
    to open: Kmenu>Utilities>Superkaramba
    and add whatever themes you want.

    Easily select/install/use desktop backgrounds:
    right click on desktop, select "configure desktop", click "get new wallpapers"

    Add to taskbar panel:
    right click on taskbar panel, select one of the top two items "Add aplet to panel" or "Add application to panel". Select any application on your computer to add to the panel as a shortcut.

    Just a few of the things that I like about KDE.

  6. #1866
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Calgary, Canada
    Beans
    4,394
    Distro
    Ubuntu 8.10 Intrepid Ibex

    Re: Gnome vs. KDE (includes Linus Torvalds)

    Quote Originally Posted by johndavid400 View Post
    one thing that keeps me on KDE is the configurability of the desktop.

    Nice transparent taskbar:
    Right click on the taskbar, select "configure panel" then click on "appearance", then click the box "enable transaprency".

    Desktop widgets (weather, sensor monitors, cpu/memory usage, etc..):
    $ sudo aptitude install superkaramba
    to open: Kmenu>Utilities>Superkaramba
    and add whatever themes you want.

    Easily select/install/use desktop backgrounds:
    right click on desktop, select "configure desktop", click "get new wallpapers"

    Add to taskbar panel:
    right click on taskbar panel, select one of the top two items "Add aplet to panel" or "Add application to panel". Select any application on your computer to add to the panel as a shortcut.

    Just a few of the things that I like about KDE.
    KDE is definitely easier to configure, but every single thing you mentioned here is also easily done with gnome. Taskbar transparency, gdesklets, adding panels, desktops, all just right-clicks away.

  7. #1867
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Dunedin, New Zealand
    Beans
    185
    Distro
    Ubuntu 7.10 Gutsy Gibbon

    Re: Gnome vs. KDE (includes Linus Torvalds)

    Quote Originally Posted by rsambuca View Post
    KDE is definitely easier to configure, but every single thing you mentioned here is also easily done with gnome. Taskbar transparency, gdesklets, adding panels, desktops, all just right-clicks away.
    I think KDE has so many places/options where things can be changed, but Gnome is straight forward and yes, Gnome is really slick when compared to KDE . What I love in Gnome is the menu system. I hate KDE bloated menu system
    With Regards,
    C.C.Chakkaradeep
    My Blog

  8. #1868
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    ::1/128
    Beans
    Hidden!
    Distro
    Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx

    Re: Gnome vs. KDE (includes Linus Torvalds)

    Quote Originally Posted by rsambuca View Post
    KDE is definitely easier to configure, but every single thing you mentioned here is also easily done with gnome. Taskbar transparency, gdesklets, adding panels, desktops, all just right-clicks away.
    I think easier is debatable... not that I want to start one here!!

    But I think all in all it just comes down whatever you are used to. If you are used to Gnome then you'll find Gnome to be easier to configure no matter what some great debater says.
    Registered Linux User #404403 - Ubuntu User #19426

  9. #1869
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Beans
    Hidden!
    Distro
    Lubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal

    Re: KDE Why is it supposed to be so great?

    KDE is superior with its defaults in almost every way to GNOME.

    file browser:
    KDE - Konqueror: good at web browsing, ftp, samba shares, desktop file system
    GNOME - Nautilus: has emblems but it can't deal with ftp/samba without stalling or with terrible problems. It can't surf the web

    KDE - kmail handles mail almost as well as sylpheed-claws and is integrated into KDE
    GNOME - Evolution: has needed to evolve for years but still hasn't. takes for ....ever to deal with mailboxes of a few thousand emails. It is the slowest mail program I know of.

    KDE - amarok: need I say more? Stable, a bit ram intensive but a quality music player
    GNOME - Rhythmbox: needs improvement, this is a euphamism. I would say it stinks to high heaven and crashes on me almost everytime I use it, but I just did and its the truth.

    I could go on but I don't think I should have to.

    Why pretend like these GUIs are on the same level? They aren't. KDE has quality, integrated applications installed by default and GNOME has inferior applications that at best one can say needs improving. I think that it is unfair to even talk about these two GUIs as comparable as one is still far better designed, KDE, to another that hides behind a centimeter thick make up of "simplicity" but is really a GUI falling apart. I am flaming I know but KDE is really so far better, to me than GNOME, at this stage that I don't understand why people support GNOME over KDE.

    I use a P4 1.7Ghz processor with 512mb of ram with a 5200GeForce Nvidia card. Both systems work about as fast on this minimal hardware specs.. Note if you do $top when you enter KDE it will read 0% for xorg this is not true for GNOME. Note that there seams to be a small memory leak in KDE but after using it for a couple of days I simply restart KDM and I am happy for what I get with it over GNOME any day. Funding, putting time into an inferior project is a waste of time at best.
    Last edited by yigal.weinstein; April 12th, 2007 at 02:34 AM.

  10. #1870
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    UK
    Beans
    4,368
    Distro
    Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat

    Re: Gnome vs. KDE (includes Linus Torvalds)

    KDE is superior with its defaults in almost every way to GNOME.
    really? . i'll have to bear that in mind from now on then. hehe.

    some rather strange logic you have there.
    WARNING FOR THOSE NEW TO LINUX: NEVER use a command given to you before asking and knowing exactly what it does.

Page 187 of 231 FirstFirst ... 87137177185186187188189197 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •