View Poll Results: What does "ready for the desktop" mean to you?

Voters
4604. You may not vote on this poll
  • Any person can install it on any computer without any problems

    1,609 34.95%
  • Anyone can use it once it's already been installed and configured

    2,414 52.43%
  • Every commercial application works on it

    453 9.84%
  • Nothing--it's a nonsensical term

    704 15.29%
  • It automatically detects most hardware without the need to hunt down drivers

    2,236 48.57%
  • It comes preinstalled on computers so novice users don't have to install it

    889 19.31%
  • It's suitable to the needs of most beginner users but not necessarily to most intermediate ones

    568 12.34%
  • Windows and nothing else... not even Mac OS X

    46 1.00%
  • Works on my desktop

    1,199 26.04%
  • Other (please explain)

    166 3.61%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 846 of 952 FirstFirst ... 346746796836844845846847848856896946 ... LastLast
Results 8,451 to 8,460 of 9520

Thread: Linux Desktop Readiness Thread

  1. #8451
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    US
    Beans
    Hidden!
    Distro
    Ubuntu

    Re: Linux Desktop Readiness Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by XogGyux View Post
    This kind of attitude is what keeps linux behind, IT IS JUST PERFECT, if so why there is a forum for development? or why there are so few users. wake up, uhmmm it is not perfect! but we can help to fix that.
    Who said Linux is perfect? Take a look at the Gutsy idea pool subforum on these forums, and you'll see most Linux users (in this case, Ubuntu users) have a lot of ideas for how to improve Ubuntu. You need to wake up and see that improvement already happens. It constantly happens every six months. If you don't believe me, try a Ubuntu CD from August 2004 (5.04 - Hoary Hedgehog) and compare it to today's Ubuntu CD (August 2007 (7.04 - Feisty Fawn).

    What's better than whining on the forums? Making a difference.
    Last edited by aysiu; August 19th, 2007 at 04:06 AM.

  2. #8452
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Beans
    Hidden!

    Re: Linux Desktop Readiness Thread

    I NEVER said Linux is perfect, I mean, right at this moment, I'm using Vista. Why? Because there are things that I can't do in Linux. I don't gripe at the community. Why? It's not their fault. I don't gripe at the developers. Why? It's not their fault either.

    Also, to hiding files in Linux requires placing a . in front of the directory, but in theoretical Linux FS standards, a ./ directory cannot exist as that is an execution.
    ATM, it is not the focus of the developers to hide the filesystem.
    Simple answer to the root directory, don't go in there in the first place.

    Also, why did you have to go to /usr/bin to retrieve your files? They are all accessible from the command line. Also if they are command line based, then average users have no use for them.
    Lets say you want MD5 (average users have no use for this program, yet other programs may want to use this for file calculation, to make sure all the data is there)
    Appearantly you went to /usr/bin to look for it.
    Yet an easier way would have been to run
    Code:
    md5 <file>
    from the command line.

    There are just some things that don't need GUI's, such as MD5. It is so incredibly easy to use via the CLI that why make a GUI in the first place?
    There is absolutely NO reason for anyone to view the "/" directory unless you are a developer.

  3. #8453
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Beans
    0

    Re: Linux Desktop Readiness Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Frak View Post
    I NEVER said Linux is perfect, I mean, right at this moment, I'm using Vista. Why? Because there are things that I can't do in Linux. I don't gripe at the community. Why? It's not their fault. I don't gripe at the developers. Why? It's not their fault either.

    Also, to hiding files in Linux requires placing a . in front of the directory, but in theoretical Linux FS standards, a ./ directory cannot exist as that is an execution.
    ATM, it is not the focus of the developers to hide the filesystem.
    Simple answer to the root directory, don't go in there in the first place.

    Also, why did you have to go to /usr/bin to retrieve your files? They are all accessible from the command line. Also if they are command line based, then average users have no use for them.
    Lets say you want MD5 (average users have no use for this program, yet other programs may want to use this for file calculation, to make sure all the data is there)
    Appearantly you went to /usr/bin to look for it.
    Yet an easier way would have been to run
    Code:
    md5 <file>
    from the command line.

    There are just some things that don't need GUI's, such as MD5. It is so incredibly easy to use via the CLI that why make a GUI in the first place?
    There is absolutely NO reason for anyone to view the "/" directory unless you are a developer.
    uhm what is all that about? where is the beautiful simplicity of a desktop system in all that you wrote? thats cool for a server, in which it is very handy to have all system files and the terminal so you can access/modify/check files quick, i think you dont grasp this yet. this is not whether or not Linux is a great OS, it is evident it is, otherwise it wouldnt last not 1 month, this is about linux for desktop. At this moment linux is an F1 racing "car" fast, robust, etc. but desktop actually means that linux must transform into a city car, simple, easy to use, automatic (not manual) user friendly. I dont know what it is your idea about userfriendly but if i would have to give an example i would never use the console as an example of user friendly. Icon=User friendly, commands=robust, util but not user friendly.

  4. #8454
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Beans
    641
    Distro
    The Feisty Fawn Testing

    Re: Linux Desktop Readiness Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by XogGyux View Post
    uhm what is all that about? where is the beautiful simplicity of a desktop system in all that you wrote? I dont know what it is your idea about userfriendly but if i would have to give an example i would never use the console as an example of user friendly. Icon=User friendly, commands=robust, util but not user friendly.
    If you cant see the beauty and simplicity of checking md5sums in the command line compared to downloading some shareware and opening up a gui to do the same thing in windows, maybe this is not for you. With time you may find Linus usable and equivalent to windows, but you will never appreciate its power.
    Registered Linux User 425324
    Ubuntu user # 12843
    Wrapping workspaces in Gnome
    Gmail notifier for Dzen

  5. #8455
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Beans
    0

    Re: Linux Desktop Readiness Thread

    where is the point of checking md5 for a desktop user? how many people actually needs it in their home pc?

  6. #8456
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Beans
    Hidden!

    Re: Linux Desktop Readiness Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by XogGyux View Post
    where is the point of checking md5 for a desktop user? how many people actually needs it in their home pc?
    Exactly, why do they need it? That's why its not in the menu's, because its a file used by intermediate/advanced users or other programs.

    EDIT
    If you want to know what its used for, the package manager uses it to make sure the entire program has been downloaded, it can thus compare a .md5 file to what it comes up with. It can then come up with a conclusion on whether it should attempt to redownload it.

  7. #8457
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Beans
    0

    Re: Linux Desktop Readiness Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Frak View Post
    Exactly, why do they need it? That's why its not in the menu's, because its a file used by intermediate/advanced users or other programs.
    exacly, thats why i dont see the point of mention it here thats an useful tool no doubts but chances are 99.99% of people wont need to run a md5 check in their home pcs ever.

  8. #8458
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Beans
    Hidden!

    Re: Linux Desktop Readiness Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by XogGyux View Post
    exacly, thats why i dont see the point of mention it here thats an useful tool no doubts but chances are 99.99% of people wont need to run a md5 check in their home pcs ever.
    APT does, and countless other programs need MD5.

  9. #8459
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Beans
    0

    Re: Linux Desktop Readiness Thread

    o well... here we go again. let me put in this way. a desktop OS is that in which you get a great md5 check application (command) and you cannot play a VCD out of the box.
    Still you dont grasp the idea quite yet.

  10. #8460
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Beans
    0

    Re: Linux Desktop Readiness Thread

    Regarding the filesystem structure. I just thought of a great example. think on the keyboard layout. in a regular keyboar you dont have any key with the characters ╗,▓, or Ñ still if for some reason you need them (if you need them supposedly you know they exist and how to write them) you can write them with Alt+187 Alt-178 and Alt-165, there is no need to overwhelm people that does not need them (which is actually the majority) and include them in the keyboard's keys, more over i dont quite think is a good idea to have keyboards with 1000+ keys!

Page 846 of 952 FirstFirst ... 346746796836844845846847848856896946 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •