In the line of digital blasphemy (Akin to a an uncompressed TGA of a stick figure)
has anyone gotten the odd idea of iceWm or fluxbox and beryl?
just curious
5 Cups of Ubuntu
In the line of digital blasphemy (Akin to a an uncompressed TGA of a stick figure)
has anyone gotten the odd idea of iceWm or fluxbox and beryl?
just curious
Chocolate-Covered Ubuntu Beans
No because iceWm, fluxbox and beryl all are window managers, hence you can only run one at a time.
In gnome beryl replaces metacity, because metacity is a WM
5 Cups of Ubuntu
Ahhh i see well that kinda explains it
I guess the confusion is my newness thinking gnome/kde and icewm/fluxbox are in the same boat guess not
Just Give Me the Beans!
I am running compiz with XFCE
Skinny Soy Caramel Ubuntu
Ive been using gnome for a long time now, tried KDE in the past but never liked it.
What would you say are the advantages and disadvantages of XFCE compared to Gnome?
Im thinking of switching over to Xubuntu.
Just Give Me the Beans!
I usually run Beryl by itself, works quite nice.
Guest
beryl, in console mode, would be cool. you could do echo 'hello world' and have it actually echo.
Just Give Me the Beans!
XFCE is really quick.Originally Posted by xopher
5 Cups of Ubuntu
Nice!!!
I might just have to try that
Ubuntu user since 2005
XFCE works quite well with Compiz.
There's a video somewhere of Fluxbuntu running with Beryl instead of Fluxbox, maybe you should look on Youtube or somewhere for it.
I try to treat the cause, not the symptom. I avoid the terminal in instructions, unless it's easier or necessary. My instructions will work within the Ubuntu system, instead of breaking or subverting it. Those are the three guarantees to the helpee.
Posting Permissions
Adv Reply
Bookmarks