Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 33

Thread: xgl--why I have chosen not to use it

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Beans
    Hidden!

    xgl--why I have chosen not to use it

    Hey! I'm a new member of Ubuntu forums! I'm also fairly new to Ubuntu as well. I'm using edgy and it's looking great.

    The purpose of this post is to discourage people from using Xgl with Beryl. Yes, it does look cool. I have tried it several times and I truly wish that I could use it on my computer. There are problems that I cannot tolerate. Sometimes, randomly, it will not work. One problem that I had on occasion was when I logged in, all the window boarders were appearing and disappearing quickly. Several other things failed whenever this happened and it was impossible to use the computer. Each time that happened I had to restart X.

    I don't know about the rest of you, but when the computer randomly crashes, something is not right. It worries me because I really don't like the idea of my Ubuntu not being stable when the default setting works perfectly.

    I don't want people to hate me for this because I am a noob and don't know what I'm talking about. I have messed with different settings and setups of xgl over about 16 installs of ubuntu. I'm really tired of messing with it and it seems that there will always be little problems. If I'm wrong, tell me, but for now I think I'll stay away from it and I would recommended to anyone new to Ubuntu to stay away as well.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Beans
    4,208
    Distro
    Ubuntu 7.04 Feisty Fawn

    Re: xgl--why I have chosen not to use it

    Thanks for sharing your experience. I've never even been tempted to try XGL, and I'm happy to wait until it's more dveloped before I adopt it. While I also feel that newcomers to Ubuntu are best advised to keep things simple (walk before you run), in the end everyone is free to pursue their curiosity, and bling is very seductive! What I'm saying is that I wouldn't expect your advice to dissuade users from trying it for themselves.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Jacksonville, FL
    Beans
    29,420

    Re: xgl--why I have chosen not to use it

    As far as I know, Beryl is a beta and when it's a beta, it means it will crash or freeze every now and then. Again, some people get it to work beautifully while others can't even get it to boot!!! Therefore, if you need your machine to do some serious work, then don't even messing about with beryl, xgl, or any other goodies/eye candies right now.

    Move to Cafe.
    In the world of Linux, who needs Windows and Gates...

    Got most of my golden beans at an auction on eBay (with a couple of free drinks).

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Beans
    4,848

    Re: xgl--why I have chosen not to use it

    I completely agree!

    Xgl,beryl, compiz are all bits of software in heavy development. Xgl hasn't got that long left IMO with the introduction of AIGLX into xorg7.1

    NONE of these are beginners subjects! I have moved countless threads from beginners to general help to try 1. give them better help & 2. shield compeltely new users from something that will break their system first time.

    I think i'll leave this thread here though - but seems like taurus moved it instead

    Pricey
    Every time you install Jaunty, a kitten........ wait sorry what year is this again?
    Please don't PM support questions, post a thread so that everyone can benefit
    Join us in #ubuntuforums on irc.freenode.net

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Kefermarkt / Upper Austria
    Beans
    828

    Re: xgl--why I have chosen not to use it

    XGL will surely die. AIGLX is the future and very stable. The factor of instability is excessive usage of 3D-accelerated desktop features or in short terms: Beryl.
    simplicity is perfection

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    UK
    Beans
    4,368
    Distro
    Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat

    Re: xgl--why I have chosen not to use it

    Quote Originally Posted by chaosgeisterchen View Post
    XGL will surely die. AIGLX is the future and very stable.
    i've heard that too. one of the reasons is that XGL is a hacked Xorg whereas AIGLX is nothing more than a plugin for Xorg. when Xorg gets updated with the necessary additions, XGL will be superfluous.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    CT - MA - NY, U.S.
    Beans
    1,619

    Re: xgl--why I have chosen not to use it

    but doesn't aiglx only work with open source drivers? or is this a misconception? unfortunately, open source drivers aren't cutting it for some people at the moment...neither open nor proprietary work for me so i'm out of luck for the moment.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Kefermarkt / Upper Austria
    Beans
    828

    Re: xgl--why I have chosen not to use it

    The nVidia beta drivers are not open source and they work perfectly with AIGLX. Need I say more?
    simplicity is perfection

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Montana
    Beans
    Hidden!
    Distro
    Kubuntu Development Release

    Re: xgl--why I have chosen not to use it

    I am sorry you had trouble.

    Quote Originally Posted by d3br074 View Post
    The purpose of this post is to discourage people from using Xgl with Beryl.
    1. You should not discourage others.
    2. Just state why Xgl is not for you.


    Xgl is known to be "buggy" and IMO is in development.

    When you run Linux you have a choice of stability vs. bleeding edge. When running bleeding edge applications you should be willing to accept a few bugs if not outright crashes.

    I don't know about the rest of you, but when the computer randomly crashes, something is not right. It worries me because I really don't like the idea of my Ubuntu not being stable when the default setting works perfectly.
    Unlike Windows, the problems you are describing are not causing any "damage" to your hardware, it is just a software crash.

    If you run bleeding edge you should be willing to debug and file bug reports with developers.

    In my experience, although they may be "geeky" developers are typically very helpful.

    I don't want people to hate me for this because I am a noob
    LOL No worries. Ubutnu is noob friendly. Welcome to Linux.

    My advice is to learn a little about Linux before you run bleeding edge. Personally I have a "production" Linux install I depend on and do not fuss with.

    I "play" on several experimental partitions, and have broken Ubuntu more then once. If, however, I break one of these patitions no worries.

    If I find an improvement that I consider stable, I will install it into production.

    HTH
    There are two mistakes one can make along the road to truth...not going all the way, and not starting.
    --Prince Gautama Siddharta

    #ubuntuforums web interface

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Sunny Southend-on-Sea
    Beans
    8,430
    Distro
    Kubuntu 20.04 Focal Fossa

    Re: xgl--why I have chosen not to use it

    Quote Originally Posted by maniacmusician View Post
    but doesn't aiglx only work with open source drivers? or is this a misconception?
    I installed Beryl with the beta nVidia drivers on my friend's computer with no problems. So I guess you're misinformed, to some extent.
    None but ourselves can free our minds

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •