I'm currently running Kubuntu 22.04. I keep my /home directory on a separate partition. I normally do a fresh installation when a new LTS comes out. This time, however, I've decided to try the upgrade path, instead. Can I assume that the upgrade process won't alter my partition structure? I'm assuming it won't but I thought I'd ask the question just to be safe. Thanks in advance for your replies.
Last edited by operator-error; September 24th, 2024 at 08:52 PM.
It won't change the existing partitioning setup. There may be many things an upgrade does, but changing the existing partitioning has never been one of them. And if it, somehow against all historical instances and behaviors, did, it would prompt you that a change was needed. And you'd need to confirm or deny it in order to proceed further.
Splat Double Splat Triple Splat Earn Your Keep Don't mind me, I'm only passing through. Once in a blue moon, I'm actually helpful.
Much appreciated. I assumed that was the case but wanted to bounce the question off someone with more experience than me. Thanks.
This isn't what you're asking, but it maybe useful knowledge as backup. Kubuntu 22.04 LTS use the `ubiquity` installer which allowed non-destructive re-installs, Kubuntu 24.04 LTS uses the `calamares` installer which likewise allows non-destructive re-installs. The replacement for `ubiquity` for Ubuntu Desktop and most flavors is `ubuntu-desktop-installer` which does not allow non-destructive re-installs for all options the prior `ubiquity` installer allowed for in comparison. In your case, I'd do the release-upgrade IF you have sufficient disk space to allow for it (as all software is downloaded prior to any installs being performed, quite a bit of free space is required). I keep the non-destructive re-install as backup, should - I have problems with the release-upgrade; I see it as an easy fix - if I lack sufficient space for release-upgrade, as there is comparatively limited download (packages come from the install media) this method works with limited disk space - Lastly if I lack time, as a non-destructive time is far faster, I often opt for this just to get it down quicker If interested in this, I'll provide two links where I talk about it - https://askubuntu.com/questions/4461...451533#1451533 - https://discourse.lubuntu.me/t/testi...testcases/2743 (see 'Upgrading using Existing Partition' testcase) ; Lubuntu QA tested for it up to 24.04 Benefits of a release-upgrade (over clean install) - changes you made to your setup are preserved - defaults set by prior release will persevere (ie. your system will act more like it did before) Whilst a non-destructive re-install will keep some of those benefits, many defaults (esp. those set by your install media) will not survive even with a non-destructive or unclean install that I've talked about here. Example.. Kubuntu being a flavor has different kernel stack defaults to Ubuntu Desktop (20.04 & later, as Ubuntu Desktop changed its default at 20.04; here I'm talking about GA/HWE/OEM); a release-upgrade will keep whatever default you installed with (in this case its packages that determine your default kernel stack). A clean or unclean install will cause the system to use the defaults of the newer install media (thus initial install media defaults are overwritten); with only the release-upgrade offering the chance to keep the initial defaults your system had. Re-install, or release-upgrade are different options. The release-upgrade option will cause the least change. FYI: The non-destructive install method is just an install without format, it's also an unclean or dirty re-install as much survives from the prior install. It'll fix package & other type issues, however if you have bad user configs on the system - those will remain untouched (thus unclean or dirty) which can mean some problems will survive re-install. To me its a useful option.
Ubuntu Forums Code of Conduct