It's best not to tamper with Kernels on a ZFS system, one good way to break it as you now have seen.
If you want stability stay within what the kernel-team provides for us.
As a tester I do play with newer kernels to see how things are going for ZFS, but not recommended for newer users
BTW My system:
Code:
inxi -Fbx|grep fs
Host: Legion-5-15ACH6-zfs Kernel: 6.10.0-15-generic arch: x86_64 bits: 64
IF-ID-2: surfshark_ipv6 state: unknown speed: N/A duplex: N/A
IF-ID-3: surfshark_wg state: unknown speed: N/A duplex: N/A mac: N/A
Device-1: bpool type: zfs status: ONLINE level: linear raw: size: 1.88 GiB
free: 1.68 GiB zfs-fs: size: 1.75 GiB free: 1.56 GiB
Device-2: rpool type: zfs status: ONLINE level: linear raw: size: 456 GiB
free: 418 GiB zfs-fs: size: 441.88 GiB free: 403.56 GiB
ID-1: / size: 413.85 GiB used: 10.29 GiB (2.5%) fs: zfs
ID-2: /boot size: 1.75 GiB used: 192.9 MiB (10.8%) fs: zfs
ID-3: /boot/efi size: 1.05 GiB used: 6.1 MiB (0.6%) fs: vfat
ID-4: /home size: 427.35 GiB used: 23.79 GiB (5.6%) fs: zfs
ID-5: /var/log size: 403.64 GiB used: 88.8 MiB (0.0%) fs: zfs
Kernel in use:
Code:
apt policy linux-image-6.10.0-15-generic
linux-image-6.10.0-15-generic:
Installed: 6.10.0-15.15
Candidate: 6.10.0-15.15
Version table:
*** 6.10.0-15.15 100
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
Note I did not compile it.
6.11 still needs a touch here and there but it is doable:
Code:
uname -a
Linux Legion-5-15ACH6-zfs 6.11.0-1002-lowlatency #2-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Tue Sep 10 08:06:06 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
I really need to stress 6.11 is in "proposed" and again not recommended.
Code:
apt policy linux-image-6.11.0-1002-lowlatency
linux-image-6.11.0-1002-lowlatency:
Installed: 6.11.0-1002.2
Candidate: 6.11.0-1002.2
Version table:
*** 6.11.0-1002.2 100
100 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oracular-proposed/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
Bookmarks