Originally Posted by
adam17
.....I have Virtual Box (same version) running on a different PC as a windows host....
There is the difference ^ that can make all the difference in performance, compatibility, usability.
I'm no longer using VirtualBox, so no idea about the problem you are having, but I was having serious performance issue when I left it. A fresh install of Bodhi Linux was taking almost 8 minutes to get fully ready and responsive. Host specs were Intel i5-1035G1, RAM 16GB, with the VM given more than adequate resources.
Switched to KVM+QEmu, and life is happy since then. Booting time of the same VM (similarly configured) with same specs is about 15-20 seconds.
Unless you have some specific need to use VirtualBox, I'd say take advantage of Linux kernel, and try KVM :
Code:
sudo apt install virt-manager
Virt-Manager is a nice and very capable GUI frontend to create and manage the VMs like VBox or VMware, and installs all the necessary packages as dependencies.
WARNING : Don't expect it to be same as VBox. While it can do more, you may miss a few features in initial use. But after a little getting used to (taking a few hours to a few days) it is WAYYY better than VBox or VMware, even better than VMware Esxi (yes, it KVM is a type 1 hypervisor, aka "Bare Metal Hypervisor", and is true to that claim).
Bookmarks