Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24

Thread: Which one between virt manager, gnome boxes and xen is better?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Beans
    83
    Distro
    Ubuntu 20.04 Focal Fossa

    Exclamation Which one between virt manager, gnome boxes and xen is better?

    How is gnome boxes and xen as compared to kvm?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Beans
    83
    Distro
    Ubuntu 20.04 Focal Fossa

    Exclamation Which one between virt manager, gnome boxes and xen is better?

    I will be using ubuntu 20.04.2 as host and q4os as guest and will use google meet. Which one will be better option for me. I am now using virtual box but having some problem in system because of python being main python version.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Halloween Town
    Beans
    Hidden!
    Distro
    Xubuntu Development Release

    Re: Which one between virt manager, gnome boxes and xen is better?

    Post #1 moved to a thread of its own.

    Please don't hijack other people's threads and don't start duplicate threads. Not only it dilutes community effort but it's also the wrong way to get the proper and adequate help to your problem.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Beans
    83
    Distro
    Ubuntu 20.04 Focal Fossa

    Re: Which one between virt manager, gnome boxes and xen is better?

    Ok I thought it to be like social medias. Very very sorry for my mistake.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    USA
    Beans
    Hidden!
    Distro
    Ubuntu Development Release

    Re: Which one between virt manager, gnome boxes and xen is better?

    I agree with slickymaster's reasoning... I was going to suggest that in the last thread, that your question would get more exposure in a thread of it's own (instead of being buried at the end of another thread.)

    "They are different animals than Virt-Manager. I know that statement deserves an explanation.

    Virt-Manager is geared for a System Administrator. It has some advanced features that are there to be able to change and make the VM behave in different ways. Those assume that the person using the VM Guest has the ability and control over the guest. You install your own VM's...

    Gnome Boxes, XenApps and XenDesktop are VM Viewers. Think of them as thin-clients. Just like VNC or RDP clients. There is a bit of shielding that just deals with viewing the VM, without having the ability to change how the VM runs on the hypervisor. It deals just with the VM itself.

    Gnome Boxes will connect to a KVM host and is geared for an alternative to Virt-Manager, but just with access as a VM Viewer. It will work out-of-the box.

    XenApp and XenDesktop is geared to work with Citrix/XenServer as a Hypervisor... You can make it work with KVM, though you have to install and configure Citrix ADM (Access Delivery Management) on the KVM Hypervisor, so that is has something compatible to connect to/through. To get around a licensing issue with the ADM, you have to configure your VM to use an external connection to your local network, instead of an internal switch to the local machine.

    As for other VM Viewers to connect to a VM running on KVM... Many, many, many options.
    Last edited by MAFoElffen; June 29th, 2021 at 07:40 PM.

    "Concurrent coexistence of Windows, Linux and UNIX..." || Ubuntu user # 33563, Linux user # 533637
    Sticky: Graphics Resolution | UbuntuForums 'system-info' Script | Posting Guidelines | Code Tags

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Squidbilly-Land
    Beans
    Hidden!
    Distro
    Ubuntu

    Re: Which one between virt manager, gnome boxes and xen is better?

    Very few people will have looked at all 3 of those. Of the people who have, I suspect they weren't looking to perform a comparison, rather they were seeking a solution for their specific needs.
    Now add in some obscure distro, I'd never heard of it, q4os, and the list of people qualified to answer the question shrinks more.

    I'm not qualified either.

    I used Xen - the xm version, so nothing recent. That was from 2008 - 2011-ish. It was used only for Linux servers on a headless system. Access was all via ssh/cli, almost always from a remote system. I have doubts that matches your needs. A few times a year, post-patching, some of the Xen VMs would refuse the boot. The more important it was that I needed to do something else, the more likely the VMs would refuse to boot. That was how it seemed. Disclosure, I owned stock in Citrix, the company behind Xen's commercial stuff.

    I've been using virt-manager with KVM/qemu as the hypervisor since around 2010. It is mostly used for Linux servers, but there are a few desktops, Ubuntu and Windows, but all of these are still accessed remotely. I use virt-manager to create a VM and to modify most settings as needed, but I use virt-viewer to access the full desktops over ssh+spice tunnels. Since I'm still using this setup, for the last 11 yrs, you can assume it is what I prefer for a number of reasons - some are technical (extreme stability) and some are political (i.e., not running a hypervisor from a corporate overlord). My personal decisions likely don't align with very many others, so add some more salt to my opinion.

    I've attempted to use Gnome boxes a few times the last few years. I remember 2 yrs ago, it worked, but felt dumbed down so much as to be limiting for my needs. It is like asking an Indy car racer to drive a plastic big-wheel. Nothing wrong with big wheels, I have one in the attic. But it isn't an Indy car - ok, get that image out of your mind. ;|

    Recent attempts to use gnome boxes has failed, so I've looked at some other options. Canonical has a snap package with a competitor to Boxes. Let me search for the name. Multipass. Multipass has a great name (Corbin Dallas!), but it has never worked for me either. Seemed it always needed to be in the shop. Snap packages don't work on many of my systems. Often for known reasons, sometimes for unknown reasons. https://ubuntu.com/server/docs/virtualization-multipass explains.

    Found this comparison: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2020...-virt-manager/

    Anyway, as you can see, my history of great results and terrible failures has warped my ability to provide a response that is useful for your needs. At least we aren't trying to compare containers to VMs. Good for that, though virt-manager is just an interface into libvirt which is just an access API for other hypervisors like virtualbox, kvm, qemu, xen, and probably some VMware stuff. The libvirt website probably has a nice diagram to explain this. https://libvirt.org/api.html has some nice diagrams - not the first one - skip that. Scroll down.

    I think you'll need to try each to make an informed decision. I think the Xen stuff makes pretty apps, but if the goal is just to run 1 VM, it is overkill. For that need, Gnome-Boxes or Multipass are probably the GUI and KVM is probably the hypervisor.
    Last edited by TheFu; June 30th, 2021 at 12:49 AM. Reason: added missing characters.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    USA
    Beans
    Hidden!
    Distro
    Ubuntu Development Release

    Re: Which one between virt manager, gnome boxes and xen is better?

    Oh man!!! TheFu I laughed so hard I hurt!

    Yes, XenServer has not been the same since Citrix bought the commercial interests to it. I have to stay out of that discussion Big Time. The same when Oracle bought Sun.

    I think if you are used to VirtualBox and it's VM interface, that you are going to be very happy with Virt-Manager and Virt-Viewer. Anything else is going to feel like a thin client, Isolated.

    A VM Viewer does have a purpose... That purpose is usually for a company to provide access to their services to their employees and customers, in a safe, secure manner. Meaning, they have Sys and NOC Admin's who control the VM's and access to them ...and don't want them F#@ked up, as well as someone entering their system unfettered. Something light that they can click on from home or the road, and do {only) what they need to do.. Got even bigger interest in the Pandemic and the work from home/remote workplace.

    "Concurrent coexistence of Windows, Linux and UNIX..." || Ubuntu user # 33563, Linux user # 533637
    Sticky: Graphics Resolution | UbuntuForums 'system-info' Script | Posting Guidelines | Code Tags

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Beans
    7,958
    Distro
    Ubuntu Mate 16.04 Xenial Xerus

    Re: Which one between virt manager, gnome boxes and xen is better?

    @TheFu -- really nice post and detailed. What's your host -- Ubuntu or another linux disto or something like ProxMox? The dedicated hypervisor distros like Proxmox have a lot of nice features baked into them.

    XMAFoElffen -- xcp-ng -- it's the open-source Citrix hypervisor. No Citrix or commercial limitations here.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Beans
    83
    Distro
    Ubuntu 20.04 Focal Fossa

    Re: Which one between virt manager, gnome boxes and xen is better?

    In virt-manager and kvm how can I use microphone in order to use google meet?
    Last edited by EngineerStrange; June 30th, 2021 at 08:50 AM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    The Left Coast of the USA
    Beans
    Hidden!
    Distro
    Kubuntu

    Re: Which one between virt manager, gnome boxes and xen is better?

    Are you using the Virtual Machine Manager GUI?
    Please read The Forum Rules and The Forum Posting Guidelines

    A thing discovered and kept to oneself must be discovered time and again by others. A thing discovered and shared with others need be discovered only the once.
    This universe is crazy. I'm going back to my own.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •