This sort of question is a "why" question. I love these because there are trade-offs and we each have different "why" answers. There is no wrong answer, except you must use GPT partitioning. After that, it is just trade-offs.
When I'm partitioning, I consider a few other things:
- For what will the storage to be used?
- How will I back up that data?
- Do my backup storage partitions have any size limits?
- Do not feel like you must allocate all the storage today. It can wait. Increasing storage is 100x easier than reducing it.
In my world, my backup storage is never larger than 4TB, so no partition is allowed to be over 4TB in size. That is a hard limitation for me. If I don't have a place to store the backups, then I won't bring the primary storage on-line either. Backups are NOT optional for me.
I keep media (videos, music, photos) outside of HOME. The reason for this is those things tend not to change, so the way I back them up is different from the way I backup /home/ or the OS files.
Files that change multiple times a year get versioned backups. Files that never change, get a mirror (rsync) backup. Smaller backups means they are faster and it means that backup storage doesn't run out because I added and deleted recorded TV shows every week as the older versioned are kept until finally 90 days later. But then I have 90 days of newer TV recordings which have to work their way through the versioned backups. Much easier to just keep media outside HOME and use rsync for backups of that data separately.
For /home/ how large could that possibly need? History tells me that 25G is about all I will ever use for HOME. I've created some larger HOME partitions and never used that storage.
https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread....7#post13883277 has a concrete example. Instead of using "partitions", I use 1 large partition and the "Logical Volume Manager" - for now, you can think of a partition as an "LV" - logical volume. That's close enough for today.
Bookmarks