a strange condition on X - is there a full display magnifier?
this happened just once, and i don't what feature this might be and how it got enabled. i later rebooted again and this strange condition did not come back. just before dinner i rebooted to do an upgrade, but i didn't have enough time. i logged in 4 users, one of which is the digital clock display user. dinner was earlier than usual, tonight. as usual, i left the computer running on the clock display. after dinner, i noticed the right side of the clock was cut off at the edge and there was no xfce panel being display. when i got back to the computer and turned the mouse back on, i was planning to first see what was up with the panel being gone or covered by the clock window. instead, as i moved the mouse around the contents on the screen also moved slowly in the opposite direction. it was still working with a 1920x1080 buffer as far as a few programs could see. the monitor was getting a subset of the 1920x1080. it looked at least 90%. fonts did look larger. i could find out the buffer size (1920x1080) but i could not find a tool that would reveal what X thought the display size is (the video it was sending out to the monitor). i switched user among the 4 users i had logged in. this only affected 2 of the users. the other 2 were normal. their screens did not move around.
is this some kind of magnify feature that i don't know about? it could be nice to use if i had control over it, especially if i can go back to normal when done. i'm wondering how i might have engaged that. i find nothing suggestive in the keyboard shortcuts or list of installed packages. if this was a magnifier is was doing only about a 10% increase. the difference, unlike xmag, is that it was magnifying the whole screen. googling for this finds such a feature for all popular systems, with it being built-in on Mac OS X. what is not clear is whether these are window (like xmag) magnifiers or full screen magnifiers (like what i effectively had). i tried scanning /usr but grepping for "magn" has no useful results and "mag" has too many to read (5943) because of so many names with word like "image".
i am particularly curious how i could have accidentally enabled in for 2 users.
Last edited by Skaperen; October 15th, 2019 at 01:19 AM.
Mask wearer, Social distancer, System Administrator, Programmer, Linux advocate, Command Line user, Ham radio operator (KA9WGN/8, tech), Photographer (hobby), occasional tweetXer
Bookmarks