Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: Second opinion on dd

  1. #11

    Re: Second opinion on dd

    Ah, I see what you are saying now. The backup will not be kept on the same box for very long at all so I am not super concerned.

    Going for human readible on df shows it will fit. I think I need to look into blocks though, the original output still concerns me.

    Code:
    -sh-3.00$ df -h
    Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
    /dev/sda5             227G   83G  133G  39% /
    Thanks again for the quick reply

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    /dev/root
    Beans
    Hidden!

    Re: Second opinion on dd

    Quote Originally Posted by s.fox View Post
    Hello everyone,

    I'm trying to create an image of a partition using dd. I have read some horror stories on the topic so I would very much value a second opinion.

    This is my setup:

    Code:
    -sh-3.00$ df
    Filesystem           1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
    /dev/sda5            237152860  86503024 138603096  39% /
    Also here, {used: 86503024} is less than {available: 138603096}

  3. #13

    Re: Second opinion on dd

    Quote Originally Posted by sudodus View Post
    Also here, {used: 86503024} is less than {available: 138603096}
    Edit

    Got my head around it, misunderstanding the output on the blocks. Thank you

    I was reading available as the total! D'oh
    Last edited by s.fox; April 1st, 2015 at 11:07 AM.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    /dev/root
    Beans
    Hidden!

    Re: Second opinion on dd

    You are welcome Good luck with the tarball, and remember to copy it somewhere else before you need it

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •