
Originally Posted by
Jamie_Dow
OK, and now, having found out a bit more about what auth.log is, I don't really see why we would have expected to find useful info in there anyway. Maybe I'm missing something. Perhaps the idea was that if somehow the users tool was asking for some kind of authentication, and was force-quit from that point (assuming that it was somehow behaving as though it had presented a dialog box to the user, asking for a password, or something) - maybe *that* could have been expected to show up there.
To my knowledge, invoking tools like user accounts, etc. involves elevating to root privilege and any elevation attempt will be logged in auth.log. What would have been useful was to see if there was a denial, which would provide a good clue about where to look next. There's nothing especially important or unique about auth.log, but when diagnosing, you've got to start somewhere and looking at authorizations for an app that deals in authorizations seemed logical. Syslog would also be a useful one to look at. Ubuntu comes with a log viewer that is very helpful.
As a rule, invoking apps graphically hides some useful output. Invoking from terminal is more informative when trying to chase down issues, as errors are directed to the terminal. Aside from looking in syslog, try launching app with terminal command:
Code:
gnome-control-center user-accounts
...and post output back to this thread.
Bookmarks