I want to run Linux from a USB stick without affecting the data on the computer.
I need persistence, but I can achieve that through either a Live USB stick, or a full USB installation.
Other than that, my top priority is speed. I believe that with the Live USB stick, all of Linux is loaded into RAM and so it runs quite quickly. I am not sure whether this also applies (or can easily be made to apply) to a full installation.
Having more space and being able to upgrade would also be nice, but are not as important to me as running quickly.
---------
Given the above terms, would it be better for me to use a Live USB or to install Ubuntu fully (possibly with some custom settings to force it to load into RAM)?
Bookmarks