Page 7 of 10 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 93

Thread: Why must LTS die?

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Williams Lake
    Beans
    Hidden!
    Distro
    Ubuntu Development Release

    Re: Why must LTS die?

    Quote Originally Posted by trixman View Post
    as a total novice to linux. i am a user now for about 5 years. and i for one enjoy the LTS vesions.
    I for one do not care for the latest release. i have heard others who have upgraded to newer versions and they had quite of few bugs.
    i use ubuntu on 1 machine & linux mint on my dell inspiron enjoy both.
    Finding bugs is why many of us upgrade to a development version, as soon as it is available.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Byron, CA, USA
    Beans
    485
    Distro
    Ubuntu 16.04 Xenial Xerus

    Cool Re: Why must LTS die?

    Even long-term-supported Releases of Ubuntu® must evolve with major changes to their software sources. I started with a third-party flavor of XUbuntu® 7.10 on an Everex® TC2502; the TC2502 is still active in rebuilt form, under successive LTS Releases: Previously 8.04.x and 10.04.x, i386 Editions; as of April 2013, 12.04.2, AMD64 Edition.

    Each LTS Releases of Ubuntu® packs software not possible to run under earlier Releases (even with PPA backports); in installing an upgrade, I save /home from the prior install to a USB memory chip prior to reformatting and repartitioning for the new install.
    Gigabyte® GA-MA78GM-S2HP (AMD® Athlon 64® X2 5600+ MPU, RS780G NB, SB710 SB)
    Audio: ASUS® XONARESSENCESTX/A (PCIe, C-Media® CMI-8788 via PCIe-PCI bridge)

  3. #63
    monkeybrain2012 is offline Grande Half-n-Half Cinnamon Ubuntu
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Beans
    874

    Re: Why must LTS die?

    Quote Originally Posted by kurt18947 View Post
    I'd be surprised if the XP share isn't higher than that in the business/professional world. I've been to a few banks and several medical offices. They are ALL still on XP, not a Win7 desktop in sight, let alone Win8. We were in one bank manager's office, he had XP and 15-20 I.E. windows open.

    God forbids if I am running my computer like a bank, that soulless, mirthless and grey institution. If that is what you want and take pride of there is always CentOS.

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Beans
    1

    Re: Why must LTS die?

    Being a business user I can almost never get away with not using LTS. I need my Ubuntu OS to be stable. I can get away with using recent releases for personal computers but not for a business computer. I think it is all about what you look for in Ubuntu. If it is the latest software and new features then the newer releases are great, but if you just need your software to be stable all the time then LTS works great!

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Peoria, Arizona
    Beans
    67
    Distro
    Xubuntu 12.04 Precise Pangolin

    Re: Why must LTS die?

    Forgive me for not reading this entire thread as what I am about to say has probably already been mentioned: There are many users that need stability in their lives. As a casual user who is primarily interested in basic word processing needs and media consumption, I found the six month upgrade cycle wearing. I got tired of having to fix bugs every six months and as a light Linux user, I wasn't particularly interested in tinkering.

    Now I believe that the six month releases have their places and I am very thankful to the people who do like to tinker with their distro because it helps to make the long term releases that much more stable. Linux can and should be an OS that is accessible to the masses, not just computer science majors and hobbyists. The success of Android is proof that the Linux kernel has something to offer everyone. Whether Ubuntu is an OS that should maintain LTSes or not I cannot say. I know that I like them and would jump ship to Debian if they came to an end. It seems to me that the Linux community is plenty large enough for distros that focus on stability and are viable for business users and casual users and for distros that appeal to users who like to tinker and have all updates as soon as possible.
    We're alike, me and cat. A couple of poor nameless slobs. -- Holly Golightly

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
    Beans
    2,572
    Distro
    Ubuntu Development Release

    Re: Why must LTS die?

    Quote Originally Posted by monkeybrain2012 View Post
    God forbids if I am running my computer like a bank, that soulless, mirthless and grey institution. If that is what you want and take pride of there is always CentOS.
    Not for me, I'm running 13.04 w/gnome. My point is that every PC I've seen in use in a professional setting has been running XP, not 7 and certainly not 8. Unlike me and other hobbyist/bleeding-edgers, businesses and enterprises value proven reliability above almost anything else.

  7. #67
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Indiana
    Beans
    1,933
    Distro
    Hardy Heron (Ubuntu Development)

    Re: Why must LTS die?

    So am I right that it kind of sounds like your only choices will be LTS or development? That's kind of scary.
    Today you are You, that is truer than true. There is no one alive who is Youer than You. - Dr. Seuss

  8. #68
    ibjsb4 is offline Ubuntu addict and loving it
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Beans
    4,996

    Re: Why must LTS die?

    Quote Originally Posted by forrestcupp View Post
    So am I right that it kind of sounds like your only choices will be LTS or development
    Thought thats the way its always been

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    New York, NY
    Beans
    1,287
    Distro
    Ubuntu 16.04 Xenial Xerus

    Re: Why must LTS die?

    Well, it will be LTS or development (which is supposed to roll into each new version without upgrading) or 6 months releases as always but with 9 months of support instead of 18 months as it has been up to now...

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Tennessee
    Beans
    3,421

    Re: Why must LTS die?

    Quote Originally Posted by kurt18947 View Post
    Not for me, I'm running 13.04 w/gnome. My point is that every PC I've seen in use in a professional setting has been running XP, not 7 and certainly not 8. Unlike me and other hobbyist/bleeding-edgers, businesses and enterprises value proven reliability above almost anything else.
    Fun little anecdote to add to this conversation:

    A month or so ago I was asked to help advise on a project another IT dept in our organization was working on. They've got a 15-year-old in-house VB6+Access monstrosity that serves as a core application for about 3-4 departments; it utterly fails to run (and locks up the whole networked application) on Windows 7. Now that the tech staff have finally convinced mgmt that they can't run XP forever, they're faced with replacing it. Replacing it either means spending over half a million dollars (this is what a development shop quoted them) or spending an estimated 2+ years developing a new version in-house.

    Guess who'll probably still be running XP in 2015?

Page 7 of 10 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •