Today's Build Failed UEFI Security Check A.K.A. Secure Boot!

[kevpan815]

Just FYI.

[kevpan815]

Forgot to mention the following: Daily-Live AMD 64 Build from cdimage dot Ubuntu dot com.

[cariboo]

Forgot to mention the following: Daily-Live AMD 64 Build from cdimage dot Ubuntu dot com.

You can add the full url here, you don't have to obfuscate them with dots.

[kevpan815]

OK, Thanks, however it some of the Other Beta Forums (Non-Ubuntu) that I post in, Leaving the Full Website in the Post is Against the Rules on those other Non-Ubuntu Websites, so I do have to be careful as each of the different Forums has their own Rules.

[grahammechanical]

Did someone forget to sign the kernel? This is on the same machine that other ISO images have been tested on?

Last year the Ubuntu developer working on secure boot expressed concern that OEMs would not implement the Microsoft specification in the way that they should. Some parts of the specification were listed as "recommended" and not "required."

I am not against links to web sites or wiki pages. What I think of as very bad manners are links that begin a download straight away without any warning of it going to happen or without giving me an option to refuse. I class that at the least as anti-social behaviour. At the worst it is ...

Regards.