Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Compare Ubuntu Studio with Ubuntu Desktop both 12.10

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Yaffo
    Beans
    118
    Distro
    Ubuntu Development Release

    Question Compare Ubuntu Studio with Ubuntu Desktop both 12.10

    Compare Ubuntu Studio with Ubuntu Desktop both 12.10
    For Example: On an ASUS 904HD with 1G Memory Based on Windows XP!
    Or Ubuntu Studio on Lenovo 3000 Desktop Pentium Dual-Core with only 500MB Memory.
    Thanks
    Sam

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    TX, USA
    Beans
    385
    Distro
    Ubuntu 16.04 Xenial Xerus

    Re: Compare Ubuntu Studio with Ubuntu Desktop both 12.10

    You need to be more specific to get any feedback. Compare what exactly? IIRC, the Ubuntu Studio is built on Xubuntu, so it's XFCE desktop environment, so no Unity or Compiz there for instance.

    The focus on the installed software is completely different as the Ubuntu Studio is geared for graphics design, video and music applications. I am not sure but it could also be shipping with a real-time (low-latency) Linux kernel which obviously the standard Ubuntu does not ship with.
    This should be a sticky, or a bug 'cos it ain't a feature

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    In here watching you!
    Beans
    Hidden!

    Re: Compare Ubuntu Studio with Ubuntu Desktop both 12.10

    Quote Originally Posted by sam-c View Post
    For Example: On an ASUS 904HD with 1G Memory Based on Windows XP!
    I don't understand the question. What does Windows XP have to do with running Ubuntu?
    Use whatever OS or desktop works for you. Dual boot or use VMs if you want. Backup your computer regularly, and definitely before upgrading, partitioning, or installing an OS.

    No support requests by PM please.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Beans
    391
    Distro
    Xubuntu 12.04 Precise Pangolin

    Re: Compare Ubuntu Studio with Ubuntu Desktop both 12.10

    Basically my understanding is that Ubuntu Studio is Ubuntu with a bunch of software added for multimedia production?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubuntu_...tware_included

    Audio

    a2jmidid – a2jmidid is a daemon for exposing legacy ALSA sequencer applications in JACK MIDI system.
    Ardour – a hard disk recorder and digital audio workstation application (Works with JACK).
    Audacious – a lightweight audio player.
    Audacity – a digital audio editor application.
    BEAST – music composition and modular synthesis application.
    Creox – A real-time guitar effects program (works with JACK).
    FluidSynth – Software Wavetable Synthesizer (Works with JACK).
    Hydrogen – an advanced drum machine (Works with JACK).
    JACK Audio Connection Kit – a sound server daemon that provides low latency connections between applications for both audio and MIDI data.
    Jack Rack – Virtual rackmount of LADSPA DSP effects plugins (Works with JACK).
    JAMin – the JACK Audio Connection Kit Audio Mastering interface (Works with JACK).
    LilyPond – a program for engraving sheet music
    Mixxx – a digital DJ-style mixing program (Not included in latest release - it must be installed manually)
    MusE – a MIDI/Audio sequencer using JACK and ALSA
    MuseScore – a music scorewriter for Linux, Microsoft Windows and Mac
    Patchage – GUI access to patch MIDI and Audio software together for JACK.
    Pure Data – a programming environment for multimedia (Works with Jack).
    Rosegarden – a digital audio workstation program (works with JACK). (Not included in latest release – it must be installed)
    Tapiir – a software multitap delay with realtime audio I/O. (works with JACK).
    Timemachine – Records the last 30 seconds of sound to the hard drive, so a 'one off' sound can be captured (Works with JACK).
    TiMidity++ – a software synthesizer that is able to convert from MIDI to various formats.
    Xwax – a vinyl record emulator.
    ZynAddSubFX – a complex yet easy to use subtractive, additive, FM synthesizer with DSP effects, and exceptional software synthesizer (Works with JACK). (Not included in latest release – it must be installed)
    Yoshimi – based on ZynAddSubFX but improves audio and MIDI capabilities, in particular, JACK performance.

    Video

    PiTiVi – a video editing program (not included in latest release)
    Kino – a non-linear digital video editor
    Stopmotion – a stop-motion animation movie creator
    VLC media player – a media player
    Xjadeo – a simple video player that gets sync from JACK transport

    Graphics

    Agave – a color scheme generator
    Blender – a 3D animation program
    Enblend – an image compositing program
    FontForge – a typeface (font) editor program
    GIMP – a raster graphics editor
    Hugin – photo stitching and HDR merging program
    Inkscape – a vector graphics editor
    Scribus – a desktop publishing application
    Synfig – a 2D vector graphics and timeline-based animation program

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Beans
    228

    Re: Compare Ubuntu Studio with Ubuntu Desktop both 12.10

    Quote Originally Posted by sam-c View Post
    Compare Ubuntu Studio with Ubuntu Desktop both 12.10
    For Example: On an ASUS 904HD with 1G Memory Based on Windows XP!
    Or Ubuntu Studio on Lenovo 3000 Desktop Pentium Dual-Core with only 500MB Memory.
    Thanks
    Sam
    Have a look here; http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2074141

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Yaffo
    Beans
    118
    Distro
    Ubuntu Development Release

    Re: Compare Ubuntu Studio with Ubuntu Desktop both 12.10

    Dual boot of course! XP and ubuntu.
    Uncle Sam

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Yaffo
    Beans
    118
    Distro
    Ubuntu Development Release

    Re: Compare Ubuntu Studio with Ubuntu Desktop both 12.10

    Somebody talked about Lxde well lxde is exactly the same on any linux, redhat suse etc... so I also install lxde. It is also quite fast.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Beans
    100

    Re: Compare Ubuntu Studio with Ubuntu Desktop both 12.10

    Yeah - Ubuntu Studio has a low-latency kernel. It also has Nautilus rather than Thunar as file manager, even though it's Xfce-based.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Yaffo
    Beans
    118
    Distro
    Ubuntu Development Release

    Exclamation Re: Compare Ubuntu Studio with Ubuntu Desktop both 12.10

    Now 14.04 Beta!
    Thanx
    Uncle Sam

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Hamunaptra
    Beans
    623
    Distro
    Ubuntu 20.04 Focal Fossa

    Re: Compare Ubuntu Studio with Ubuntu Desktop both 12.10

    Quote Originally Posted by iamkuriouspurpleoranj View Post
    Yeah - Ubuntu Studio has a low-latency kernel. It also has Nautilus rather than Thunar as file manager, even though it's Xfce-based.
    Lets agree to disagree

    Ubuntu Studio comes with Thunar file manager. At least 12.04, 13.04. 13.10 did and 14.04 does.
    Running 14.04 now !

    Yes, Low-latency kernel is default in Ubuntu Studio. Currently running:

    Code:
    ~$ uname -a
    Linux nbe42 3.13.0-8-lowlatency #28-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Tue Feb 11 18:24:35 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
    bhatta

    May the Source be with you !
    Ash nazg durbatulûk, ash nazg gimbatul, ash nazg thrakatulûk, agh
    'Buntu-ishi krimpatul !

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •