Shortly after I reported a bug that turned out to be a duplicate, I found this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/globalmen...n/+bug/1045196 . I'm trying to be nice, but I couldn't help commenting. My experience trying to report bugs in Ubuntu projects has been consistently infuriating.
To spare you some reading, I'll summarize what happened. A recent update broke some Thunderbird menus, and someone duly reported the bug. The first action on the bug report was to mark it invalid because it was not reported with Apport. A link to an article was posted, which says not to report bugs to Launchpad using the Launchpad form! The article further says that bugs will be ignored or marked invalid (presumably as a kneejerk reaction) if they are not reported with Apport.
Really? All the documentation I have seen says that Apport captures crashes. Period. Just how does one use Apport to capture a broken menu?
Am I missing something here?
If it was just this one case (which has been fixed), it wouldn't bother me. But there are other examples. I previously reported a bug that always crashes the entire login session, and yet Apport does not generate a crash report. The bug reports are "invalid", but as far as I know, the bug is still there.
Are serious bug reports being defined away without fixing the bugs? And how does one report a broken menu, with or without Apport?
Bookmarks