Page 11 of 120 FirstFirst ... 9101112132161111 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 1196

Thread: Moblock (peerguardian linux alternative)

  1. #101
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Beans
    574
    Distro
    Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron

    Re: Moblock (peerguardian linux alternative)

    wahey it works
    thanks for your help clessing
    it wasnt really difficult either as long as the correct files are in the repository
    hardy 64 bit

  2. #102
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Beans
    9

    Re: Moblock (peerguardian linux alternative)

    I have been using Ubuntu for only a few week. When I try to apt-get moblock it gives me these errors...
    moblock-nfq: Depends: lsb-base (>= 3.0-3) but 3.0-1ubuntu8 is to be installed

    Where can I find these packages? thanks

  3. #103
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Beans
    574
    Distro
    Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron

    Re: Moblock (peerguardian linux alternative)

    Phil196949
    did u install dapper (ubuntu 6.06)?

    as far as i can see 3.0-1ubuntu8 is only abailable in breezy, which is the old ubuntu version

    dapper uses 3.1-5ubuntu2
    hardy 64 bit

  4. #104
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Beans
    9

    Re: Moblock (peerguardian linux alternative)

    Hey thanks! I got it going. I was wondering why I was getting so many errors
    when compiling packages. Now I am enlightened!

  5. #105
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Corcaigh, Eire
    Beans
    7
    Distro
    Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala

    Re: Moblock (peerguardian linux alternative)

    Hi. Many thanks for the guide.

    A question: is there some way to make a fixed "Whitelist", as with Peerguardian on Windows?

  6. #106

    Re: Moblock (peerguardian linux alternative)

    Quote Originally Posted by Nonninz View Post
    Hi. Many thanks for the guide.

    A question: is there some way to make a fixed "Whitelist", as with Peerguardian on Windows?
    http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.p...34#post1213534

    That's what the search function is for.
    Last edited by clessing; July 16th, 2006 at 09:26 AM.

  7. #107
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Jersey
    Beans
    4

    Question Re: Moblock (peerguardian linux alternative)

    Hello all,

    Quote Originally Posted by pelle.k View Post
    Moblock and fireHOL works fine together if you know what to add in the fireHOL configuration file. But fireHOL is a "iptable rules creator script", NO GUI, and thats why i figured i'd make a simple gui for that purpose as well.
    Has anyone set up firehol to work with moblock? Does anyone know what needs to be added to firehol configuration? When I used PeerGuardian, I had to change all ACCEPTS in firehol's configuration file to PEERGUARDIAN and I had to create a PEERGUARDIAN chain. IE:

    Code:
    # PeerGuardian Configuration (Must be in place for PeerGuardian to receive packets)
    iptables --new PEERGUARDIAN 
    iptables -A PEERGUARDIAN -j QUEUE
    
    server "dhcp dns ssh samba ntp ping" PEERGUARDIAN
    Now I'm wondering if I need to do the same in order to get firehol and MoBlock to coexist nicely.

    Further information on running PeerGuardian and FireHOL together can be found here. http://forums.phoenixlabs.org/t11437...rguardian.html

    Thanks in advance,

  8. #108
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Beans
    201
    Distro
    Ubuntu

    Re: Moblock (peerguardian linux alternative)

    does anyone know if moblock works with guarddog firewall? or if there are any hitches to get them to work together? i don't know how to test if they are working together. Also, how do I even test moblock? I'm running 'tail -f /var/log/moblock.log' but nothings happening.
    Your video ipod will work with Amarok.

  9. #109

    Re: Moblock (peerguardian linux alternative)

    Quote Originally Posted by jms830 View Post
    Also, how do I even test moblock? I'm running 'tail -f /var/log/moblock.log' but nothings happening.
    You should be able to do so by pinging a blocked host. E.g. a microsoft web server, etc.
    Example output:
    Code:
    Blocked OUT: Nederlands Forensisch Instituut,hits: 1,DST: 195.169.99.137
    Blocked OUT: Nederlands Forensisch Instituut,hits: 2,DST: 195.169.99.137
    Blocked OUT: Nederlands Forensisch Instituut,hits: 3,DST: 195.169.99.137
    Blocked OUT: Case Western Reserve University fakes,hits: 1,DST: 129.22.247.172
    A statement that is valid for all those firewall tools and scripts out there, no exceptions:
    You have to adapt _each_ firewall tool/script by hand in order to get it working properly with moblock or peerguardnf.
    Just starting both will not result in a setup that makes sense.
    You have to understand how to use iptables to do this.
    Or you have to find someone who does. I will restructure the moblock package scripts towards September/October which may include the integration of popular firewall tools. Unfortunately, I'm way to busy to do this earlier.
    Last edited by clessing; July 19th, 2006 at 08:05 PM.

  10. #110

    Re: Moblock (peerguardian linux alternative)

    Quote Originally Posted by c0ugar View Post
    Code:
    # PeerGuardian Configuration (Must be in place for PeerGuardian to receive packets)
    iptables --new PEERGUARDIAN 
    iptables -A PEERGUARDIAN -j QUEUE
    
    server "dhcp dns ssh samba ntp ping" PEERGUARDIAN
    Now I'm wondering if I need to do the same in order to get firehol and MoBlock to coexist nicely.
    If this worked with peerguardnf, it should work with moblock-ipq. If you're using moblock-nfq, use
    Code:
    iptables -A PEERGUARDIAN -j NFQUEUE
    In both cases, have a look at /etc/moblock/MoBlock-nfq.sh, though.
    If firehol is being startet after moblock, it should not be a problem as long as firehol deletes all iptables stuff on startup.

Page 11 of 120 FirstFirst ... 9101112132161111 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •