You can always compile it yourself if you wish.
But RC releases just aren't stable enough for me.
You can always compile it yourself if you wish.
But RC releases just aren't stable enough for me.
Running wine/WoW on a AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+(2.6GHz)w/4GB DDRII(667) and a NV9600GSO w/768MB DDRIII.
In the meantime you can also run
This will install the latest wine 1.3-beta, which is already labeled as wine 1.4-rc1.Code:sudo apt-add-repository ppa:ubuntu-wine/ppa sudo apt-get install wine1.3
Right, I did it this way in the PPAs because renaming the package requires users to manually accept the removal and replacement on upgrade. For Oneiric, Natty, Maverick, and Lucid I am delaying that problem till 1.4 releases in full.
Meanwhile, in Precise, there are actual wine1.4 packages in the archive. They work fully, however they're not yet available with apt-get -- the reason is that I am waiting on the archive admins to manually remove the old wine1.2 and wine1.3 packages, which wine1.4 provides replacements for. Until then, the only way to get the wine1.4 as I've packaged it in Precise involves manual compilation (on multiple architectures even!).
I will probably put the precise pacakges in the PPA to deal with this when I update them to rc3.
Thanks.
Same as previous post re Lucid.
John
its may3rd and wine1.4 is still not available in the repo .. is it just me acting like a noob !!??
Thinkpad X61
Thinkpad R500
Not getting any younger thinkpads:
Thinkpad R40 - RIP
Bookmarks