Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 85

Thread: Intel's Ultrabook

  1. #21
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Beans
    Hidden!

    Re: Intel's Ultrabook

    - LED Monitor (Large Price Increase, only to help the battery acheive the 3-4 hours.)
    LED monitors also have better viewing angles and less reflection, meaning it'll look better if you plan on ever taking it outside your basement.

    - Higher Capacity Battery (But this means a slight price hike, even though you still only get about 3-4 hours as per normal gaming laptop.)
    The intel spec says 5-7 hours, though we've yet to see how much this amounts to in practical use.

    - No CD-ROM Drive (Price Reduction unless a media card reader is placed, especially PC-CARD. Then no change. More than one USB Port increases the price.)
    The only reason people still use optical drives is because PC companies are still selling them. It's as outdated as the magnetic tape, let it die already.

    - SSD << A serious must for the battery. (Large price increase due to low demand. Same as LED Monitor above.)
    SSDs also improve performance significantly, meaning I/O is no longer the bottleneck.


    All in all, ME GUSTA. I'm probably getting one next year, once they start shipping models with Ivy Bridge.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Beans
    925

    Re: Intel's Ultrabook

    Quote Originally Posted by BeRoot ReBoot View Post
    The only reason people still use optical drives is because PC companies are still selling them. It's as outdated as the magnetic tape, let it die already.
    Unless I'm missing something, CDs are still the best way to install an ISO image, which is the default.
    I really do with .imgs were more popular, but while ISO is still the standard, optical drives will live.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Beans
    61
    Distro
    Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat

    Re: Intel's Ultrabook

    Quote Originally Posted by IWantFroyo View Post
    Unless I'm missing something, CDs are still the best way to install an ISO image, which is the default.
    I really do with .imgs were more popular, but while ISO is still the standard, optical drives will live.
    Yes and while people still use optical drives, people of the future will continue to facepalm into infinite because tape drives totally worked fine as well.

    Infact I'm pretty sure pen, paper and filing cabinets worked fine as well, so better stick to those as well. While we're at it we might as well stop all technological progression because everythings fine right now.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Western Australia
    Beans
    11,480
    Distro
    Ubuntu 12.04 Precise Pangolin

    Re: Intel's Ultrabook

    Quote Originally Posted by andras artois View Post
    Yes and while people still use optical drives, people of the future will continue to facepalm into infinite because tape drives totally worked fine as well.
    Optical drives are very useful. You can still burn DVDs for other people, give large files to others without worrying about getting your flash drive or HDD back, install multi-gigabyte programs and operating systems, watch or rip DVDs, etc.

    Just because application delivery and broadband are getting better, doesn't mean that they're ready yet to replace ye olde optical drive.

    I don't think the ultrabooks need a built-in optical drive, but on the same token I think a lot of people would need an external optical drive if their computer didn't already come with one.
    I try to treat the cause, not the symptom. I avoid the terminal in instructions, unless it's easier or necessary. My instructions will work within the Ubuntu system, instead of breaking or subverting it. Those are the three guarantees to the helpee.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Kansas City, KS
    Beans
    1,319
    Distro
    Ubuntu 14.04 Trusty Tahr

    Re: Intel's Ultrabook

    Yeah, my external optical is how I watch movies, and it's still better and more dependable for doing a live boot than a flash drive.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Beans
    23

    Re: Intel's Ultrabook

    Quote Originally Posted by Warpnow View Post
    I just wish there was a laptop on the market with decent battery life.
    Are you including small laptops (netbooks)? Mine has an advertised life of 14 hours, and there are others with 13.5, 15, etc hours advertised.

    Quote Originally Posted by LowSky View Post
    10.1" isn't enough. and 1" isn't going to make a difference. I need at least a 12.5" screen or its too small.
    12.4" would be too small?

    Quote Originally Posted by Lucradia View Post
    - LED Monitor (Large Price Increase, only to help the battery acheive the 3-4 hours.)
    Er, if you can find a new laptop *without* an LED screen (except for OLED screens etc on phones, an "LED screen" means an LCD with LED backlighting) I'll be very surprised.
    Last edited by PhillyPhil; September 6th, 2011 at 03:22 AM.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Kansas City, KS
    Beans
    1,319
    Distro
    Ubuntu 14.04 Trusty Tahr

    Re: Intel's Ultrabook

    Indeed. I was a little amused at the list, since they're all standard to a decent netbook.

    To elaborate on the bit LowSky and I disagreed on, given the difference to me between a 9" screen (a dumb toy) and a 10" (a reasonably usable workspace,) I personally think that one more inch would help a great deal, but I'm not going to find fault in someone not wanting to go under 13", either.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Beans
    21

    Re: Intel's Ultrabook

    I'm a bit amused at your being amused.
    Netbooks are outdated already, and supposed to be replaced partly by xPad and paratly by UltraBook. And the difference between a Netbook and an Ultrabook is the "power". You can run almost all average programs for your daily use and work on UltraBook, without big difference of speed with common Notebooks. Imagine: Photoshop, AutoCAD, WarCraft...

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Beans
    21

    Re: Intel's Ultrabook

    Quote Originally Posted by Copper Bezel View Post
    Yeah, my external optical is how I watch movies, and it's still better and more dependable for doing a live boot than a flash drive.
    How can you stand for the noise and heat generated by an CD-ROM while watching movie? Have you tried movie on USB-HDD or even USB flash disk?

    Why it's still better and dependable with a CD-Rom? I'm really interested what makes you into such a judgement.

    In fact, I do have CD-ROM/Writer on my laptop, but I pulled it out and throw it away long long ago, to save the weight, perhaps a bit power also. I've not touched a CD-ROM for several years.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    South Africa
    Beans
    341
    Distro
    Ubuntu

    Re: Intel's Ultrabook

    LED monitors also have better viewing angles and less reflection, meaning it'll look better if you plan on ever taking it outside your basement.
    LED monitors are also so bright it feels like looking directly at the sun when you are tired or have just woken up,I am the latter.
    Registered Linux user: #543082
    Registered Ubuntu user: #34219
    http://dvisagie.com/


Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •