Anybody else thinks that every version ubuntu gives a step back?
Look at 8.04 vs 10.10, 8.04 is 100x more responsive and fast, while 10.10 is all slow and unresponsive. They care about making boot 5 secs shorter and having a "better boot experience", what IMO they failed. Not only that 8.04 boot splash is A LOT nicer than 10.04/10.10 with plymouth working, but also that chances are that plymouth wont work and it will look like ****. Instead, they should care about overall system speed and responsiveness. Just take a look at USC, it is insanely slow, sluggish, its kinda unbelievable that they release it the way it is. Add/remove software wasnt A GREAT SOFTWARE, it actually could be improved, but its still much better than USC.
My 2 cents
Bookmarks