,
,
Last edited by carlosgs91; March 3rd, 2012 at 09:36 PM.
Problem is writing this kind of program is not legal in the United States thanks to one of the most retarded laws ever written (oh is saying that illegal?) called the DMCA.
In order to license this kind of stuff you have to literally hemorrhage money, and the fees are pretty outrageous (they recently got a little better but not by much). It's too bad music webcasting is not covered by the same rules as terrestrial broadcasting. They get it pretty easy.
Offering music on demand to users would just be, wow. A lot of money flying down a hole. And absolutely no return if it were free.
.
Last edited by carlosgs91; March 3rd, 2012 at 09:36 PM.
EDIT:
So the DMCA prohibits two things here:
- The act of circumventing copy protection/copyright
- Distributing tools or technologies that allow for the circumvention of copy protection/copyright
In general, US Courts have unfortunately interpreted this rather broadly. One of the most widely known (ab)uses of this law was to outlaw the distribution of the DeCSS program, as well as compromised encryption keys, that could decrypt DVDs so that people with Linux could actually, I dunno, watch the DVD they paid for.
Last edited by soltanis; March 17th, 2010 at 12:26 AM.
That's one of the current questions in "Internet Law". Under what jurisdiction should activities done through the internet be considered, under the server's or the user's or both's? Not being a lawyer myself (though having attended some Law classes because of interest), it's possible that each case requires a different answer for this...
Spain has the weirdest Copyright Law in the whole world. Anything is legal unless you earn money and the way you do it doesn't affect the copyright holder's economic interests... stupidly enough, this Law makes the GPL completely useless as you can redistribute Free Software without its source as long as it's free as beer... But you also have to count on the "other" part of the Law, which is that if the copyright holder believes that he's losing money because of your activities, you have to pay to him... and currently, this clause is interpret in a very broad way and there you have these days SGAE (a guild of editors and authors) wanting to be paid for the music played in weddings, etc... So, maybe it isn't even legal in Spain...
Currently, there's an important ruling from a court in Barcelona declaring P2P legal; sadly, I don't remember if it was a first or second instance court. SGAE will surely challenge the ruling up to the Tribunal Supremo (Supreme Court), where I hope this gets finally clarified for once in Spain. (It's better to have a bad law than having no idea what the law actually is...)
But again, using such a program wouldn't be legal in the USA and the rest of the world...
.
Last edited by carlosgs91; March 3rd, 2012 at 09:36 PM.
You mean something like lastfmripper? Used on Last.FM?
Hm... you seem more informed than me ... despite both living in the same country
Ok, I thought SGAE had won some court cases on the basis of "interface of economic interests". I see now that's just the argument they use, not the actual ruling of any court. Thanks!
Anyway, outside Spain, this would be illegal for sure.
.
Last edited by carlosgs91; March 3rd, 2012 at 09:36 PM.
How about broadcasting music over VOIP? So that people dial-into a stream. Then select something via DTMF, the server decodes the message and plays appropriate content.
Would DMCA be still all over you then (not that it's relevant to me)?
Peace
P.S.: Moving to Spain actually sounds easier
Bookmarks