Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Anyone using KMS?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Beans
    Hidden!

    Anyone using KMS?

    Has anyone here used systems with KMS before?
    Is it supposed to affect the boot only, or also the actual desktop?
    I have two computers and one has KMS enabled (it has an intel graphics card).

    I've noticed that all the graphics on it look significantly crisper and sharper, to the point in which I get annoyed when looking at the other computer. I thought it was because of KMS but then after closer inspection, realised that it has a HD screen.

    Is anyone able to confirm whether KMS is what is making things radically different or is it merely the screen?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Beans
    Hidden!

    Re: Anyone using KMS?

    Used it on Fedora, worked great, especially when you upgrade mesa it makes the FOSS ATi driver impressive.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Beans
    Hidden!

    Re: Anyone using KMS?

    Yeah, I'm thinking of either installing fedora on my nvidia comp or upgrading the kernel.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Beans
    Hidden!

    Re: Anyone using KMS?

    It's nice, but it annoys me to no end when udev loads and it changes screen resolution mid boot.
    Hey, you created me. I didn't create some loser alter-ego to make myself feel better. Take some responsibility! -Tyler Durden, Fight Club

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Oz
    Beans
    4,405

    Re: Anyone using KMS?

    The next kernel or two should have KMS pretty well mainstream with any luck.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Beans
    Hidden!

    Re: Anyone using KMS?

    The new one .33 has it. And even though lucid is getting .32, its being backported so that lucid will have nouveau.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    RiceMonsterland, Canada
    Beans
    Hidden!

    Re: Anyone using KMS?

    Works great on Fedora with an intel card
    Code:
    while true; do echo -n "RiceMonster "; done
    Best thread ever

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Beans
    Hidden!

    Re: Anyone using KMS?

    Is the difference significant?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    RiceMonsterland, Canada
    Beans
    Hidden!

    Re: Anyone using KMS?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sashin View Post
    Is the difference significant?
    For the bootscreen, yes.
    Code:
    while true; do echo -n "RiceMonster "; done
    Best thread ever

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Beans
    217

    Re: Anyone using KMS?

    I found (on ATI* atleast) it offers performance at the cost of stability, I had to disable it completely^ for fedora and am having a love/hate relationship atm, everything was fine for a while, but then an update introduced a crash that happens at a random point after boot (usually 10s of minutes).

    *I have an RS482 chip though which is particularly ugly to code for

    ^The nice thing is that it is really easy to disable so while I currently don't have any compositing it doesn't make my machine unusable.

    Quote Originally Posted by Sashin View Post
    Is the difference significant?
    For open drivers (intel, radeon, nouvea) yes, KMS is required for DRI2, on my machine this means:
    • 1.5-2 times the fps in glxgears
    • support for more opengl features
    • kwin compositing will work


    If you use closed drivers (flgrx or nvidia) then probably not
    Last edited by Xbehave; January 27th, 2010 at 03:53 AM.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •