Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: The corporate mind set and linux.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Beans
    15

    The corporate mind set and linux.

    Please tell me if my assumptions are incorrect, but it seems to me that certain peripheral manufacturers are missing a point somewhere. Since Canonical came good with Ubuntu,their stable 8.10, 9.04, and 9.10, distros are among the fastest proliferating platforms out there? So why in the name of market share are these guys not cashing in like crazy, on a massive opportunity. If they would only pay some attention to the low end and middle range product driver support under linux (O.K. lots of distros with maybe subtle variations, but at least home in on the major and most popular of them). If they are not careful they will learn the hard way as did Digital Research when a certain golfing enthusiast chose to give higher priority to a golfing engagement than a meet with IBM about this ridiculous idea of an operating system tailored to a personal computer. Maybe Bill Gates just doesn't like golf .
    What's the point of this rant? Well how do we get these guys to wake up and smell the coffee? If they can't be bothered, at least release enough information/data into the public domain in order that others can be!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Beans
    144

    Re: The corporate mind set and linux.

    Okay, for the record, here's a link to the GPL:

    http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.txt

    Read it. It *IS* the license that comes by default with Ubuntu Linux, and it means something more important than money: The elimination of greed!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Beans
    352

    Re: The corporate mind set and linux.

    To make drivers work nicely with Linux, they need to be open source. Companies might not want to do that for whatever reason.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Beans
    144

    Re: The corporate mind set and linux.

    Quote Originally Posted by JDShu View Post
    To make drivers work nicely with Linux, they need to be open source. Companies might not want to do that for whatever reason.
    Yeah. True, but what about jockey-gtk?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Beans
    12,944

    Re: The corporate mind set and linux.

    A few points .

    1. Profit is not greed, it creates jobs ,puts food on plates, educates houses and treats the ill etc.

    2. Fastest proliferating platform? I think that is currently Windows 7

    The corporate mindset set is simple...cost effectiveness.
    This account is not active.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Beans
    Hidden!

    Re: The corporate mind set and linux.

    They can't usually outright opensource stuff because there are probably certain conditions which cannot possibly be exposed to third parties so they'll create proprietary drivers. Now I wrote an article on proprietary drivers a while ago on another website, I used ATi for example, so I'll quote what I wrote here:

    I've seen far too many ATi rants on various Linux forums now, so I just need to post this. I'm going to use ATi as an example here because it's what I have to use fglrx, I like ATi and it's really not their fault that **** doesn't always work right.

    This is why if ATi pulled away from Linux although I own their graphics cards I'd ******* praise them in a way. They make a driver for Linux, 2 weeks later some new **** comes out and the driver is ******, there's no backwards compatibility going on and this is something which I think OpenSolaris does right.

    ATi have released their spec so the FOSS people can make something useful out of it, what have they achieved? ******* little, sure they'll say oh it's getting there, it's a start, but no because the proprietary drivers could ******* do this last year! Can't use the old drivers to prove it though because it won't be supported anymore because the system has changed too ******* much. I can use versions of the ATi driver that existed before Vista was released and they will work just fine, sure they don't have all the improvements the new versions do but the point is they ******* work!

    X11 is another thing, they release new versions because of new functionality (Yeah new functionality, you mean like my Xbox360 controller being detected as mouse initially?), it's good if you're going to make a new version but they really need to introduce something which is pretty much unknown in the Linux world and it's called BACKWARDS COMPATIBILITY!

    With ATi releasing drivers and people complaining that they're not working with Arch for example here well it's easy, Arch is cutting edge, you can't expect ATi to cater for them, they don't have the resources to do so, they've got to pay their team because in the real world people aren't going to come to work to do **** for free, there are only so many hours in a working day so you can't possibly expect them to test it on every distro especially make a rolling driver for an OS which isn't backwards compatible with anything because they'd have to have a team running 24/7, which is fine but it's going to cost and considering probably not even 1% of ATi's customers are going to be using Linux anyway then it's fair enough that there can't always be a new version of the driver for everything new on Linux, X, Kernels etc.

    It makes sense that ATi will only support the main distros that their customers use which are things like, Ubuntu, RHEL, SLED/SLES, OpenSUSE etc. Other distros really aren't that important to them because 1) They'll need even more money to run such a small department, 2) An even smaller percentage of their 1% Linux Users will be using these distros.
    Also stuff has changed since I wrote it since the FOSS ATi drivers are good, and the filter really shows you how much I swore without realising haha. But ignore the FOSS stuff, I'm focusing on why proprietary drivers aren't too great on Linux.

    Now after reading that, consider that ATi is a big company. Now look at some of the other hardware companies which are absolutely nothing compared to ATi, it makes sense why they simply cannot support Linux.
    Last edited by Techsnap; January 23rd, 2010 at 06:59 PM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Ireland / The Czech Repub
    Beans
    283
    Distro
    Ubuntu 20.04 Focal Fossa

    Re: The corporate mind set and linux.

    Quote Originally Posted by KiwiNZ View Post
    A few points .

    1. Profit is not greed, it creates jobs ,puts food on plates, educates houses and treats the ill etc.
    .

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Beans
    256

    Re: The corporate mind set and linux.

    Quote Originally Posted by KiwiNZ View Post
    1. Profit is not greed, it creates jobs ,puts food on plates, educates houses and treats the ill etc.
    You left out "pays the bribes to the politicians to keep business interests safe."

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    United States
    Beans
    328
    Distro
    Lubuntu 18.04 Bionic Beaver

    Re: The corporate mind set and linux.

    [profit per unit] * ([units sold] * [Linux market share]) - ([cost of driver developement] + [cost of distribution]) = [potential profit]

    In most cases, potential profit from this model either costs the manufacturer, or promises limited returns.

    Consider instead this model:

    [profit per unit] * ([units sold] * [Linux market share]) * [Odds of successful Linux community driver developement] = [potential profit]

    IF [potential profit in model A] > [potential profit in model B] THEN [hire a dev team] ELSE [cross fingers and hope for community development]

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Mystic Ruin
    Beans
    Hidden!

    Re: The corporate mind set and linux.

    Quote Originally Posted by KiwiNZ View Post
    ...
    1. Profit is not greed, it creates jobs ,puts food on plates, educates houses and treats the ill etc.
    ...
    We don't need a monetary system for that. See "The Venus Project"/" The Zeitgeist Movement" for more details.

    And to the Profit is not greed. That maybe so but the pursuit of profit 9/10 leads to greed and corruption.

    Quote Originally Posted by Roland TD-12 Rat View Post
    Please tell me if my assumptions are incorrect, but it seems to me that certain peripheral manufacturers are missing a point somewhere. Since Canonical came good with Ubuntu,their stable 8.10, 9.04, and 9.10, distros are among the fastest proliferating platforms out there? So why in the name of market share are these guys not cashing in like crazy, on a massive opportunity. If they would only pay some attention to the low end and middle range product driver support under linux (O.K. lots of distros with maybe subtle variations, but at least home in on the major and most popular of them). If they are not careful they will learn the hard way as did Digital Research when a certain golfing enthusiast chose to give higher priority to a golfing engagement than a meet with IBM about this ridiculous idea of an operating system tailored to a personal computer. Maybe Bill Gates just doesn't like golf .
    What's the point of this rant? Well how do we get these guys to wake up and smell the coffee? If they can't be bothered, at least release enough information/data into the public domain in order that others can be!
    Linux is still too small in the eyes of the Suits (business men).
    Last edited by MasterNetra; January 23rd, 2010 at 09:59 PM.
    Diaspora Handle: masternetra@diasp.org

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •