Should Linspire Offer CNR for Ubuntu Users?

[mstlyevil]

Porting CNR to Ubuntu was being discussed in another thread with Linspire CEO Kevin Carmony. Here are some quotes from that conversation.

Kevin, would your company consider selling a multimedia pack for distros like Ubuntu to provide a legal way to obtain codecs and other proprietary multimedia software. One of my major concerns is the fact I may be breaking the law just to have multimedia support under Ubuntu and I have been waiting for some one to step up and offer these at a reasonable price. Since your company already has contracts with the makers of these codecs and software it would be in the perfect position to offer this to the end users of the free distros who share my concerns. It could also help your company's bottom line and open source in general. What are your thoughts on doing something like this and is it feasible?

somewhat off topic, but have you ever considered porting cnr to other distros?

Here is Kevin's reply

Absolutely. And guess which distro is top on our list? =)

I've talked to Mark about it. We both like the idea a great deal. We'd just make a way to apt-get the CNR client for free, then Ubuntu users could choose to simply use apt, OR, for those who want the one-click convenience of CNR, they could try CNR for free for 15 days, and if they like it, pay for the service ($20 per year).

You can use apt or CNR with Linspire today. I think that would be a great choice for Ubuntu users as well. Having more choices is always a good thing.

Yes, I don't want to get off topic here with more about this here in this thread, so I'll make a separate post and get input from you all about this idea there. So, save any comments, and look for that post.

Kevin

So here is the question posed to you Ubuntuers. Do you want something like this as a option to download and legally install codecs and other non-free software? As it stands now in some countries it may be illegal to do so on your own without permission or paying the royalties. This would provide an economical and easy way to aquire these codecs legally. There are other benefits that can be discussed of course and this thread is not just limited to just the codecs. People can also voice their concerns and questions for such a move but please do so with respect.

Edit: BTW it is a multiple choice poll because some people that might support such a move still may not use the service.

[Kevin Carmony]

First off, I want to say thank you to everyone who has welcomed me to your forum in the past. I've made my share of posts here in the past, usually trying to address or answer any questions people had about Linspire, and I've always been treated with nothing but courtesy and respect. Thank you.

The most recent instance of me jumping in to answer some questions, was in regards to OOoFF, where I responded with this post. In that thread, someone asked if Linspire has ever considered offering our CNR (click and run) service to other, non-Linspire distros. I didn't want to take that thread off topic, so I promised I'd make a separate post about this topic. So, here it is. =)



Has Linspire ever considered offering their CNR (click and run) service to other distros?

The short answer is yes, and Mark and I have discussed this possibility for Ubuntu and we both like the idea. (Perhaps it would be more accurate to say "we're both open minded to the idea." Linspire would need to come to learn that it was something some Ubuntu users would want, and Mark would insist it be done in a way true to the values of Ubuntu or not at all.) The longer answer follows and I'd LOVE to hear input from Ubuntu users about this, as well as participate in the quick poll I posted.

First off, for those who may not know, CNR (click and run) is a service Linspire users can subscribe to ($20 per year) which allows them to install thousands of software programs with LITERALLY one click. Many have the misconception that CNR is simply a GUI for apt-get. Not at all true. CNR is a lot more, and includes total software management features, complete updating management for your entire PC, "Aisles" which allow for grouping of applications to be installed with one click, CNB's or click and buys to purchase dozens of commercial products such as Star Office, games, etc., all with one click, user reviews, screen shots, and so on. If you're not familiar with CNR, you can learn more about it here, nd you can browse through the CNR Warehouse here.

It would be very difficult for Linspire to offer CNR to just any distro, however, we have considered doing it for Ubuntu. 1) I've talked with Mark about it, and he's supportive of looking into the idea. As you know, Mark is open to most ideas that involve seeing a Ubuntu baseline being used to build other offerings, allowing more people to enjoy open source. Mark would have to be OK with whatever happened here, if anything, or we won't do it. 2) There are a lot of Ubuntu users, justifying our work to do this, and 3) Ubuntu is Debian based, as is Linspire, so our CNR Warehouse model could be wrapped around Ubuntu.

CNR already has the ability to support different pools, or what we call "Warehouses." For example, depending which version of Linspire you're on, you have a different CNR Warehouse available to you. In fact, CNR is sophisticated enough that it can support hundreds of different Warehouses. For example, Linspire employees have a different Warehouse than others. Linspire "Insiders" (15,000 testers) have access to a different Warehouse, and so on.

The idea would be to create a CNR Warehouse for each of the different Ubuntu distros. We would then make the CNR client available via apt-get. Once you've got that, the rest becomes one-click easy.

Why would Ubuntu users want to use CNR?

Several reasons...

1. Linspire supports dozens of proprietary applications, drivers and codecs that you may want to have access to. MP3, DVD, Real Audio, Windows Media, Quick Time, Java, Flash, nVidia, ATI, Bitstream fonts, and so on. For example, right out of the box, Linspire users have access to all these different file types. With CNR, you could, with one click, deliver all this capability to your Ubuntu computer.

2. You may simply want the one-click convenience of CNR. You'd get the software management tools, Aisles, update notification, CNB's, and so on.

3. You could more easily set up your non-technical friends with Ubuntu. 98% of the world will no way take the time to learn how apt-get works. With CNR, they can manage all their software needs easily and graphically. Linspire is well known for being ultra easy to use, and that anyone can use it. CNR allows Ubuntu to be used by more "average Joe" computer users.

4. More and more open source software is now available on the web via CNR, without even going to the CNR Warehouse. For example, if you go to the download page for Nvu, you'll see that with one click, you can install that product.

But, if I use CNR, can I no longer use apt?

Because the CNR pool would be the same pool at what you're using apt from, yes, you could still use it. In other words, Ubuntu users would simply have the choice: 1) just use apt, like they do now. 2) pay $20 to use the CNR service, or 3) do both.

The key is that the choice would totally be yours.

Why wouldn't Ubuntu just offer this on their own so it could be free?

Mark agrees that CNR has four years of wonderful technology behind it, and it would be very difficult to offer something like CNR, at least not in the near future. Even if they could, chances are it wouldn't be free, because CNR isn't just the software client (that's a very small part of CNR), it's about the farm of servers that Linspire has to pay to keep running and bandwidth costs. $20 a year is a very fair price for such service that costs us a lot to run and offer.

Anything we would do, Mark would of course make sure was in line with Ubuntu's goals and mission, and we'd be happy to work with him to assure that is the case. (For example, he wouldn't put our client in the default distro but would have to be apt from a different location or downloaded and installed separately.) We would only do this with Mark's OK.

Your input

Again, up to now this is still in the though process, so no guarantees if we would do this, and that's why I'd love to hear your input. I hope you'll answer the poll and post your comments and questions below.

Thanks!

Kevin Carmony
CEO, Linspire, Inc.

[Stormy Eyes]

If I can ignore CNR and keep using apt, it's all good.

[GeneralZod]

Technical question: I understand Ubuntu has many deltas from the main debian line. How much work would be required to ensure that CNR for Ubuntu delivers all of the proper Ubuntu-patched packages? Would it just be a case of sync-ing the CNR servers with Ubuntu's, or would it be more complex?

Also, where would the proceeds go to? If it's back into the community (paying developers; offering bounties; maybe, if the issue of micropayments could be sorted, direct to the the developers of the most-downloaded apps!; etc), then I think this would be a good thing to have!

[Alpha_toxic]

BTW it is a multiple choice poll because some people that might support such a move still may not use the service.

I think I'm one of those people. It's good for those countries where it's illegal to dl the codecs, but as I'm not living in such a country I'm not going to use it.
BTW, I can't seem to find the right answer for that in the pool's options (or is it the first one?).

[Stormy Eyes]

I guess this answers my other question. It appears that you're saying that CNR for Ubuntu would use Ubuntu's repositories, so there would be no risk of breakage due to mixing repositories. I'd be tempted to use it myself if I could install Linux ports of commercial games (like Neverwinter Nights and Doom 3) via CNR.

[nocturn]

Thanks, but no thanks.

Off course, others may find it useful and I have nothing against it.

[Brunellus]

I guess this answers my other question. It appears that you're saying that CNR for Ubuntu would use Ubuntu's repositories, so there would be no risk of breakage due to mixing repositories. I'd be tempted to use it myself if I could install Linux ports of commercial games (like Neverwinter Nights and Doom 3) via CNR.

I concur with StormyEyes. For most users on these forums who are used to apt-get (or at least Synaptic), CNR seems rather pointless. But if you're offering repos with commercial software that won't break an ubuntu install, suddenly things become interesting.

That said, the universe and multiverse repos fill most of my needs, so CNR is still of very limited utility.

[Kevin Carmony]

Looks like someone beat me to the punch! By about 2 minutes!

I hope everyone will read the post I made about CNR before answering and answer the poll I posted.

Thanks,

Kevin

[mstlyevil]

I think I'm one of those people. It's good for those countries where it's illegal to dl the codecs, but as I'm not living in such a country I'm not going to use it.
BTW, I can't seem to find the right answer for that in the pool's options (or is it the first one?).

It should be the first one if you support it but then you select the I will not use it option.