Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Restricted extras vs Medibuntu

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    st louis mo usa
    Beans
    1,477
    Distro
    Ubuntu 14.04 Trusty Tahr

    Restricted extras vs Medibuntu

    Medibuntu is about my only use of the command line
    so I thought I would try the restricted extras instead
    installed easily but my test dvd did not play
    de installed easily too.

    Medibuntu's stuff was cut and pasted to the command line and just worked.
    the test dvd just played.
    in this case I will stick with the successful harder way.

    The results....
    I finally upgraded the family room media player
    I had used an old 933 P-III with a DVI out video card
    now a tiny atom/ion itx box & brick power-supply
    it even looks like an AV thing
    rather than an old computer.
    OS upgrade with no hardware upgrade: $0.
    having a smooth first install: ....priceless.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    UK
    Beans
    Hidden!
    Distro
    Ubuntu 22.04 Jammy Jellyfish

    Re: Restricted extras vs Medibuntu

    Quote Originally Posted by armandh View Post
    I thought I would try the restricted extras instead
    installed easily but my test dvd did not play
    de installed easily too.
    This is not a question of ubuntu-restricted-extras versus Medibuntu. For encrypted DVD playback the two are complementary.

    With ubuntu-restricted-extras you would have installed the libdvdread4 library. From the libdvdread4 package description:

    libdvdread provides the functionality that is required to access many DVDs. It
    parses IFO files, reads NAV-blocks, and performs CSS authentication and
    descrambling.

    libdvdread currently uses libdl to dynamically probe for libdvdcss at runtime.
    If found, libdvdcss will be used to decrypt sections of the DVD as necessary.
    .

    Note that it says, "if found, libdvdcss will be used..." The library libdvdcss2 is provided by Medibuntu and without it you will not be able to play encrypted DVDs. In fact, without libdvdread4 you won't be able to play them either. The reason that you could after you "de installed" ubuntu-restricted-extras is that restricted-extras is merely a meta-package. All its dependencies, including libdvdread4, will remain installed even if ubuntu-restricted-extras has been uninstalled.
    Ubuntu 20.04 Desktop Guide - Ubuntu 22.04 Desktop Guide - Forum Guide to BBCode - Using BBCode code tags

    Member: Not Canonical Team

    If you need help with your forum account, such as SSO login issues, username changes, etc, the correct place to contact an admin is here. Please do not PM me about these matters unless you have been asked to - unsolicited PMs concerning forum accounts will be ignored.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    st louis mo usa
    Beans
    1,477
    Distro
    Ubuntu 14.04 Trusty Tahr

    Re: Restricted extras vs Medibuntu

    well if I have to go to medibuntu anyway...

    OK. what does medibuntu not have?
    I still need flash

    I find VLC and medibuntu completes the AV playback
    but I could be missing some thing
    OS upgrade with no hardware upgrade: $0.
    having a smooth first install: ....priceless.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Beans
    380
    Distro
    Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx

    Re: Restricted extras vs Medibuntu

    I think it's more of a both/and rather than either/or, since they both add functionality to Ubuntu. Besides AV-related files, ubuntu-restricted-extras also installs Microsoft TrueType fonts, flash, java, and cabextractor. I always install both on my Ubuntu systems, even on my Dell Vostro A90 with a 4 GB SSD (there's enough room for both).
    Main: Intel Core i7 920 D0 @ 4.0GHz | Asus P6X58D Premium | 6 x 2GB Mushkin Redline 1600 7-8-7-24 | EVGA GeForce GTX 560 Ti | 6 x 1TB WD Caviar Black | Mint 15 Cinnamon / OS X 10.7.3
    Portable: Dell Mini 9 | OS X 10.6.7

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Beans
    381
    Distro
    Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal

    Re: Restricted extras vs Medibuntu

    I've never used Medibuntu. What does it have to offer?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Beans
    381
    Distro
    Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal

    Re: Restricted extras vs Medibuntu

    Just checked the official site. Doesn't seem too compelling to me, although it certainly did have its place in the olden days.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Birmingham, England
    Beans
    2,400

    Re: Restricted extras vs Medibuntu

    essentially non-free codecs and other non-free software useful to ubuntu user

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Beans
    341

    Re: Restricted extras vs Medibuntu

    Medibuntu offers proprietary software and third party codecs for media playback that cannot be shipped with Ubuntu for legal reasons. Ubuntu only offers free software and the minimum proprietary hardware drivers needed to make your computer run. Nothing else. That's why adding it to your Software Sources list will give you a full multimedia desktop.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Beans
    391
    Distro
    Xubuntu 12.04 Precise Pangolin

    Re: Restricted extras vs Medibuntu

    Quote Originally Posted by Ginsu543 View Post
    I think it's more of a both/and rather than either/or, since they both add functionality to Ubuntu. Besides AV-related files, ubuntu-restricted-extras also installs Microsoft TrueType fonts, flash, java, and cabextractor. I always install both on my Ubuntu systems, even on my Dell Vostro A90 with a 4 GB SSD (there's enough room for both).
    agreed

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •