Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Packages.Ubuntu.com

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Rumplestiltskin, Cal.
    Beans
    Hidden!
    Distro
    Ubuntu 18.04 Bionic Beaver

    Packages.Ubuntu.com

    I've installed Karmic, v. 9.10 as of November, 8, 2009. I did the "clean install" as I wanted EXT4 and Grub2.

    After the install and various updates, I wanted to add the "sensors-applet" to my panel.

    I tried to add the applet through the Panel/Add. Next I found:

    http://packages.ubuntu.com/karmic/sensors-applet

    and even though there is both a link to download this applet and a link to the developers page; NEITHER has instructions on how to do the installation, setup, and usage.

    I have found this throughout the Linux "world". Not exclusively, this recurs enough to cause me to remember this as a problem. (Not everybody who writes software, forgets to tell people how to install it). Meanwhile, netsearching: sensors, temperature, karmic gives contradictory info about whether this package is/is not working in Karmic v. 9.10

    People have an application, but give no information on how to make it work. Worse, sometimes, a tarball, once "open" or whatever must then go through steps like:

    make
    make install
    make clean

    I've yet to know what that is about.

    Thanks for your time.
    AMD FX-6300, 8gig ddr3, MSI 970 Gaming, 256G WD blue SSD, GeForce GT710, HP LJ Pro M277-fdw

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Beans
    1,745

    Re: Packages.Ubuntu.com

    Download sensors-applet
    Download for all available architectures Architecture Package Size Installed Size Files
    amd64 104.9 kB 672 kB [list of files]
    i386 102.1 kB 656 kB [list of files]
    64bit: http://packages.ubuntu.com/karmic/am...pplet/download

    32bit: http://packages.ubuntu.com/karmic/i3...pplet/download
    Licat volaré si superturgum Aquila volat

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    California Republic
    Beans
    2,657

    Re: Packages.Ubuntu.com

    find the .deb

    download it to your desktop

    double click on it


    whatever-package-name.deb is the closest equivelent we have to a 'setup.exe' file. treat it as such - but, you may have to manually resolve dependencies as a result. which is a pain.


    is there any reason you are not installing via software center, apt-get, or synaptic?

    download a .deb directly is considered a last resort, not a first, in the Linux world.

    generally, the only reason to download a .deb is because:

    1) you need a more recent version of the program, and can only find the recent version as a lonely .deb file.

    2) the computer you wish to install the program on does not have internet access. in this case, if possible, it is best to focus 100% on download the .deb that will give the target computer internet access so this is not needed in the future. example: the .deb that contains the package needed to make a particular wireless network card work when wired internet isn't available. and from then on, go ahead and take advantage of the wifi to install stuff via apt-get, software center, or synaptic.


    all install methods, properly done, essentially result in the exact same thing.

    software center is the easiest and does most of what anyone could possibly need.

    synaptic is pretty easy, and does many things that software center does not.

    apt-get and the command line does everything that 99% people could ever wish for. most of that last 1% are programmers or software developers. or Gentoo users. us volunteer forum helpers often give directions that start with 'sudo apt-get bla bla' partially because we are lazy.

    it is easier to tell someone
    type 'sudo apt-get whatever'
    then to tell them to
    click here, then click here, then click on this tab, do a back flip, then click here, then check this box, then click apply.



    make, make install, make clean, etc etc... this is called 'compiling from source', is the absolute last resort, and is there to take care of that last 1%. there is nothing "wrong" with that last 1%, mind you, except that they put out more than 1% of the how-to guides one is likely to find out there... which can lead one to think that "many" or "most" or "all" Linux users do things that way. not the case at all! they are what we could accurately describe as the the disproportionately vocal minority.



    I have never compiled from source. ever.
    Last edited by earthpigg; November 11th, 2009 at 03:51 AM.
    Semper Fi

    My Non-Ubuntu Blog.
    All posts by me are Public Domain.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Beans
    Hidden!

    Re: Packages.Ubuntu.com

    You don't need to use the packages.Ubuntu.com . There's an application in Ubuntu named synaptic. System ->synaptic package manager . Open it and Click on search . Enter the name of the software you want to install and search. Put tick marks on required ones . Apply. Done
    if you want to use packages.Ubuntu.com , at the end of search results, you will see a link named i386 and amd 64 . I386 for 32 bit cpu and amd64 for64 bit cpu . Click on appropriate one . In the page that opens, click on the server (mirror)near to you .

    Hopes this helped you . Good luck

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Beans
    6,537
    Distro
    Ubuntu 13.04 Raring Ringtail

    Re: Packages.Ubuntu.com

    Once you've installed the package through your package manager type:
    Code:
    man packagename
    to get a manual for it. Some are better than others though, and they all tend to be pretty dry.

    In the case of sensors-applet you need to open a terminal and run the following command to get it to work:
    Code:
    sudo sensors-detect

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Beans
    69
    Distro
    Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat

    Re: Packages.Ubuntu.com

    Whenever I want something I just go to Ubuntu Software Center and that install what I want. No need to make, make install and make clean. After installing it just appear on the Application menu. Now thats need.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Western Australia
    Beans
    11,480
    Distro
    Ubuntu 12.04 Precise Pangolin

    Re: Packages.Ubuntu.com

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark_in_Hollywood View Post
    Worse, sometimes, a tarball, once "open" or whatever must then go through steps like:

    make
    make install
    make clean

    I've yet to know what that is about.
    It's usually:

    ./configure
    make
    sudo make install

    It's the process of compiling software from its source code. The computer itself can't understand the source code; it needs some software to convert it into the processor's language.

    The "configure" script finds out what is installed on the system, so it can work out what features to include when compiling, and where all your libraries are. The "make" part actually compiles the software, and the "make install" puts it into a place where your system can find it.

    Linux runs on lots of different sorts of CPUs that don't speak the same language - for instance, an ARM CPU won't run binaries built for i386 and vice-versa. To a lesser extent, sometimes binaries built for one distribution won't work on another. That's why you need to compile software from source occasionally.

    That doesn't explain why they don't give you instructions, but it does explain why you need to compile.
    I try to treat the cause, not the symptom. I avoid the terminal in instructions, unless it's easier or necessary. My instructions will work within the Ubuntu system, instead of breaking or subverting it. Those are the three guarantees to the helpee.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •