Yes, I think Linux vendors such as Red Hat should be allowed to bid (I think Red Hat is a great company, as a matter of fact). However, do you really feel violated about this? It's just an operating system, for christ's sake. The only ones who are at a loss here is Red Hat. You aren't being forced to use another operating system. It doesn't affect you like you think it does. This is just a buisiness matter, it's not a human crisis.
Examples please.I guess you thinks it's OK that MS is sue happy on smaller Linux distros too.
Really? You compared it to the civil rights movement, then called it discrimination (I refer to the quote above) and yet you don't feel discriminated against? I don't get it.And I don't feel discriminated against.
So what? It's business, get over it.My company would not be up for the contract either way. I don't own and distro. All other OSes were discriminated against.
No, I do know what's going on. I just realize this doesn't involve me and doesn't affect my usage of Linux. Enough Microsoft conspiracy theories from overly excited new Linux users already. Also, last time I checked, it was the swiss government who just gave Microsoft the contract in the first place.I guess u don't realize what is actually going on here, or do just think that MS has reformed and no longer tries to run over it's competition with it's financial weight and legal scare tactics.
Most companies are arguably evil. That's capitalism for ya'.MS is an evil company, has been and will continue to be and attitudes like your will keep it that way. We don't have 100 million dollar lawyers working for the communty (well, maybe redhat), so if it's to change, we have to make it change.
I bet he's already talked about this.Where's Richard Stallman when u need him???
Bookmarks