Re: Open Source more expensive than proprietary?
Well if you talk about piracy it is cheaper to run Windows than it is to run Linux. You don't have to train anyone and you don't need IT personnel with *nix skills (who tend to be more expensive). Considering the problems with pirated software though, it won't be cheaper for long. Already you can't install any service packs for pirated Windows (unless you do some magic) leaving you w/o the much needed improvements. There is also costs due to the time it takes to deal with malware/registry issues.
Conclusion: In the short term pirated proprietary is cheaper than FOSS, in the long term FOSS wins.
Since I get asked alot, I am originally from Ukraine but am Russian by nationality. My nick means specter in Russian.
Bookmarks