Re: Would you prefer Ubuntu have a version that was a rolling release model?
Originally Posted by
billgoldberg
I think it would be better if non system critical applications (transmission, open office, firefox, ...) got updated to their newest versions upon release (small testing time buffer).
Others like xorg, ... should be left alone.
I got the xorg thing on Arch too. Thank Jebus for Links.
I had the same problem with my arch, thats why i dual boot arch and ubuntu hardy. i have the newest one that i use most of the time. and the more reliable one installed for if (when) somthing ***** up during a update.
back on subject, i dont think ubuntu should be roling release, i have enought problems with the 6month upgrade that normaly breaks somthing, or somthing stops working in the new version that was fine in the last one.
for rolling release i will stick with arch.
Desktop:i7 875k|4gb OCZ platinum ddr3 2000|Evga P55 LE mobo|OCZ RevoDrive 50gb|ATI 5850 Black Edition|Silverstone FT02|corsair tx650
Portable: 13" Macbook Pro 2.8ghz i7 16gb RAM | Asus EEE TF101 | Samsung Galaxy S2
Bookmarks