Upon close look at both logos, it appears that the heads on the "Clan" logo are attached, whereas on the Ubuntu logo, they are detached. They are very close, but not exactly the same.
Upon close look at both logos, it appears that the heads on the "Clan" logo are attached, whereas on the Ubuntu logo, they are detached. They are very close, but not exactly the same.
I think you guys are jumping at nothing. Combat Arms is a free game anyway, they dont make any money. Besides, isnt it good that the Ubuntu logo gets seen everywhere? Its free advertising in a way, dont knock it
A computer is only as powerful as the user who uses it.
They do make money, by selling equipment for your character like modded guns and clothes and such, that is how they keep the game afloat. You have to set a strong precedent with things like this, you can't just let people use your copyrighted property...before long others might get away with it.
The issues with trademark infringement is that if the infringing product is really crap one, people will associate that with the logo. So when they see the real thing, they might think it's that it's that crap one - and discard it.
I've noticed this right after I installed the game a long time ago. I'm pretty certain the designer might have used the original ubuntu logo, but i think it's too minor of an infringement to pursue. Just email them and ask them to change graphic.
Ubuntu Corner - My personal Ubuntu based blog.
If canonical doesn't protect its trademark it will lose it.
A os without a unique logo is lame.
SUCCESS! I declare success!
InaTux has just stated:
"Combat Arms, as of the "02-24-2009 [Unscheduled Maintenance]" update, no longer uses the Ubuntu trademark! A "cease and desist" order must have been sent, or Nexon had the trademark pulled, to prevent legal action. The new icon has a similar design, but, is far from the Ubuntu logo."
We did it boys
Very cool
Bookmarks