Fixed in 169.09
http://www.nvidia.com/object/linux_display_ia32_169.09.html
Type: Posts; User: 5-HT; Keyword(s):
Fixed in 169.09
http://www.nvidia.com/object/linux_display_ia32_169.09.html
One way would be to list all of the modules the default kernel is loading and to only include that hardware support into your config.
Linux kernel in a Nutshell has some great information (and...
a) If you generated the .debs to install using the the instructions in this thread, it's simply a matter of removing the associated packages.
b) If you installed the kernel and modules manually,...
They'll all be in the Ubuntu Kernel sources that are easily available for download. Simply a matter of grabbing the patches and editing slightly to avoid rejects for the new kernel.
Cheers,
NP. Kind of a shame there's no Core Duo specific option, but P4 or P-M work fine.
GCC is the GNU C / C++ compiler that will take the kernel source code and magically turn it into a binary...
Hi,
Yup, dual core- but a core duo, not a core 2 duo.
That's a big difference as far as kernel processor optimizations are concerned.
That would do it .
As gcc recommends -march=prescott...
Um...my custom vmlinuz is 1.7 and modules are 19.
Sorry, but you're not really inspiring trust at all...
Your kernel will knock my socks off @ 180 mb and you cannot even cross compile? 3.5 gb...
Yup, depmod creates modules.dep and associated file...though that should have been taken care of automagically. A sudo depmod -a will do the trick if you're booted with the custom kernel.
cheers,
Glad it worked :)
Same way you'd manually patch any source file...
From the top-level source directory: patch -Np1 < /path/to/patchfile
cheers,
It's pretty much the primary no-no. There was a bug sometime ago in which some entries in /dev were deleted if the kernel was compiled with root privs. Better to play it safe IMHO and compile as a...
The ipw3945 module needs to be compiled against a specific kernel. You'll need to build your own to get it to work with your custom kernel.
Sources and instructions can be found at...
Nope. You can easily have many different kernels existing in parallel.
Yup.
Would be a safer way to go. Alternatively, you could either use fakeroot or build the kernel in your home directory.
cheers,
Save for either security fixes or major bug fixes (which may just be patches and not version upgrades), updates will only be provided for the next Ubuntu version barring backports.
There have been...
Best bet would be to just use the Ubuntu kernel sources, and change your config from there IMHO.
The issue is that Ubuntu heavily patches their kernel source and to do the equivalent would require a...
Grab 'em from nvidia's site. Instructions are listed on the download page. It's a simple as doing a 'sudo sh NVIDIA-Linux-x86-100.14.11-pkg1.run', and either having your xorg.conf updated...
No need to start over: check out 'mkinitrd'
cheersr,
Did you compile 2.6.22.5 from vanilla sources? If so you'll need to compile your own modules that are included in 'restricted modules'
Do you have any of the debug options on? That could certainly do it. Also, you can always do away with your initial ramdisk, just make sure that you include your root filesystem and disk controller...
Here's what I'm using:
$alignc${color red} CPU Temps(C): $color ${execi 6 /usr/bin/sensors | grep Core | paste -s | cut -c15-16,19-20,71-72}You'll need to play around with the parameters...
The Linux Kernel, gcc, or Apache, bar none. What's with all the DEs? There are a plethora of apps working behind the scenes that make them possible. The same goes for browers, emulators (or rather,...
I'm not a big fan of the built-in forum search. Doing a google search with 'site:ubuntuforums.org' always gets the job done though.
For me it comes down to 1) trusting the author(s) and 2) trusting that what you are downloading is exactly what they have released.
For 1), az made some great points.
For 2) I always check the...
I'll start adding once I get some free time (very shortly, yay a break! :)).
Just wondering if you're looking for brief, concise descriptions or more in-depth information? I could start adding...