in lisp it could be anything you want .. like:
(sum-of (iterating :with i :from 1 :to 5 :stepping 2 :collecting (* i i)))
=> 35
..or instead of building up a list, then returning it to...
Type: Posts; User: lnostdal; Keyword(s):
in lisp it could be anything you want .. like:
(sum-of (iterating :with i :from 1 :to 5 :stepping 2 :collecting (* i i)))
=> 35
..or instead of building up a list, then returning it to...
I'm not sure what you mean, but I'm able to get the API information and other things I might need presented to me in various ways at rate that by far surpasses the rate in which I'm able to parse and...
i'd like to know what you are looking for .. some concrete example instead of this sillyness .. for example, have you seen the man pages?
here is an online version of them:...
here is a screenshot of Slime (a Common Lisp IDE or GUI or whatever) .. it looks very simple, but has many somewhat "hidden" features
.. i've bound auto-completion to tab, for instance "(m-v-b"...
yeah, using C as a sort of portable ASM for whatever language you are using is a great idea
practically all languages can communicate with C since it has a well defined ABI etc. .. this is often...
edit: great .. a double post .. ignore this one
RIchard James13:
long interesting read .. i must say that the biggest obstacle when doing something non-trivial has always been myself .. i've failed so many times i've lost track of it
i read...
i cannot access this but based on the abstract text i can make a rough guess at its contents, and i can provide you with multiple sources that show an opposite result
.. if you insist i can dig...
yeah, you're right
to be honest it was just a silly emotional kind of outburst added as an edit to a response that in fact did resolve the OPs problem
.. to get an idea of what state i was in...
So lnostdal, you are claiming that nobody can write C++ programs in a sane manner. There are so many people who do.
[/quote]
..i hope you did get the context of that response..
but, no, i use...
check this out, richard: http://www.paulgraham.com/icad.html
anyway, of the languages you know (somewhat, or reasonably well) .. are they "different enough" or just all languages within the same...
yes, you're right .. lisp is the jazz and classical music of programming languages, dwithney67 .. no one listens to it
..know what sells? britney spears .. go figure
..and, yeah .. no one "gets...
oh, i don't give a rats *** about what "everyone else" thinks .. i can think for myself you know
..so, do you have this; an opinion of your own?
sure thing .. this is the internet; they...
if you type man exp you'll see they mention "Link with -lm" there.
The reason? I'm not sure to be honest. I guess they want to keep some of the less commonly used code outside of glibc to save...
*sigh* .. the smug lisp weenies of course! .. i was "a C++ weenie" at the time
uh, yes .. is this so hard to imagine?
lisp doesn't have FOR, but i've added it .. there .. now try this in...
err, no .. c++ is like fighting windmills .. they never back down and do what i want them to do .. now why would i do such a crazy thing?
pffft..you'll never get it anyway .. and i'll turn out be...
actually .. that code could be simplified somewhat .. /proc/self/exe .. as in, "self", will always refer to the "right thing"
so just open the file, read, and you're done .. that's it
edit:...
i would think the reason for me asking would be pretty darn obvius .. but never mind
http://www.flipcode.com/archives/Path_To_Executable_On_Linux.shtml
..there might be easier ways, but i...
well, in time you will realize you where wrong
Common Lisp .. SBCL; it is a native optimizing compiler .. under some circumstances where you'd expect C to shine (ex, boring linear numeric...
i haven't looked at you code at all(#1), but i'd say one of your destructors is throwing an exception .. or something ..
http://yosefk.com/c++fqa/exceptions.html#fqa-17.3
#1: there are less...
i could see this coming based on your other silly thread(s) .. first of all, see this:
http://yosefk.com/c++fqa/index.html
because we do not use c++ or c# .. we use languages that have...
use
extern int* your_array;
..in a common header file ..note that this is a declaration only
then define the variable in, say, the same file you have the function that assigns to it or...
yeah, you could potentially screw up your entire system when doing development as root
if you need to be root i'd strongly consider using qemu or virtualbox or somethinglikethat
how do you...
Well, then we disagree. Flame if you want; I do not care. Heck -- I won't even respond.
edit: maybe you wouldn't care to comment if i said this "vs." a language like, say, any other .. think about...
thank you WW .. =)
SymbolicWeb came through btw. .. we now have a student aboard for the summer .. *whoho!* time to hack ..... =)