Search:

Type: Posts; User: SpookyET; Keyword(s):

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Search: Search took 0.01 seconds.

  1. [all variants] Re: Apt is recommanding x86_64 packages on i386

    Oh, I missed that. I thought it's x86_64 only because .19 won't boot. .16 boots.
  2. [all variants] Apt is recommanding x86_64 packages on i386

    I don't understand why apt is showing me x86_64 kernel packages. It wants to upgrade my kernel to x86_64.

    http://www.studioindustryllc.com/user/spookyet/miscellaneous/apt_x86_64_on_i386.png
  3. Re: Firefox 3 beta 5 - disappointment, it's a cpu hog!

    Firefox on Ubuntu is rubbish compare to its Windows counterpart because it's not built the same way. It's not optimised.

    Check https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xulrunner-1.9/+bug/213708
  4. Re: April 2008 Desktops (Safe for work ONLY) - Please include theme details.

    I like the theme. Mind releasing it?
  5. Replies
    11
    Views
    1,201

    Re: Whee! Firefox 3.0 beta 5 packages for Gutsy

    Firefox 3 should be using cairo, not pango. That said, the benchmark tests javascript, not font rendering.

    Bug filed: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xulrunner-1.9/+bug/213708
  6. Replies
    11
    Views
    1,201

    Re: Whee! Firefox 3.0 beta 5 packages for Gutsy

    The Windows version is PGO optimised. People will hate the Ubuntu version knowing that the Windows version is so much faster.


    This was a test I did on Arch Linux using i686:
    Firefox 3 Beta 3 on...
  7. Replies
    11
    Views
    1,201

    Re: Whee! Firefox 3.0 beta 5 packages for Gutsy

    Mozilla:-)

    The nightlies are PGO optimised. I guess it's up to me, yet again, to build the best firefox package.

    I hate doing it because it takes 2 hours. PGO builds are abnormally slow to...
  8. Replies
    11
    Views
    1,201

    Re: Whee! Firefox 3.0 beta 5 packages for Gutsy

    If you want to learn how to build it properly, check http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/firefox-spookyet/firefox-spookyet/

    I'll do a build once I learn how to create debs. Pacman is idiot proof....
  9. Replies
    43
    Views
    4,022

    Re: Firefox Beta 5!

    The Backporters build is crap. It's not build properly. Crappy fonts. Doesn't replace firefox 2.0. I'll probably do a build. I do the best build on Arch Linux.
    ...
  10. Replies
    11
    Views
    1,201

    Re: Whee! Firefox 3.0 beta 5 packages for Gutsy

    Is it PGO optimised?
  11. Re: April 2008 Desktops (Safe for work ONLY) - Please include theme details.

    Murrine Wise/Murrine Wise Dark
  12. Re: April 2008 Desktops (Safe for work ONLY) - Please include theme details.

    http://imgplace.com/image_bin/6055/cc37c959609a82d6351d3ad4f560c48b.png.th.jpg

    http://imgplace.com/image_bin/6000/b3ecf7c494aa66a15a4a0aeb11fc6a3f.png.th.jpg
    ...
  13. Re: March 2008 Desktops (Safe for work ONLY) - Please include theme details.

    What icon theme are you using?
  14. Re: January 2008 Desktops (Safe for work ONLY) - Please include theme details.

    *link removed*

    GTK2: Gommapiumalooks
    Icons: Black-White 2 Vista
    Emerald: Radial (modified, fatness removed)
    Wallpaper: Joanna Kruppa
  15. Re: December 2007 Desktops (Safe for work ONLY) - Please include theme details.

    December Desktop
    Questionable SFW

    OS: Ubuntu 7.10
    Theme: MurrinaCandy (Requires Murinne GTK Engine)
    Icons: nuoveXT2.2
    Pointer: BlueCurve (Fedora 8)
    AWN Theme: QV Black
    Main Menu: Suse Linux...
  16. Replies
    1,374
    Views
    2,147,735

    Re: Howto: Backup and restore your system!

    Hello. I'm new to linux and bash scripting, but I do have programming knowledge. I've been looking for an easy to use backup program for Ubuntu. I am yet to find one. I'm hopping for the time machine...
  17. Replies
    1,195
    Views
    486,122

    Re: Moblock (peerguardian linux alternative)

    apt-get update
    apt-get upgrade


    0.8-35 works for me. both IP and port whitelisting. I have only tested OUT, not IN.
  18. Replies
    1,195
    Views
    486,122

    Re: Moblock (peerguardian linux alternative)

    It's more secure to have the ports separated by protocol.
    It's not confusing for those that understand the difference, but it is confusing when it isn't working.

    You can even go further and...
  19. Replies
    1,195
    Views
    486,122

    Re: Moblock (peerguardian linux alternative)

    I'll wait for it. Hopefully, you did not revert the IP whitelisting changes.
  20. Replies
    1,195
    Views
    486,122

    Re: Moblock (peerguardian linux alternative)

    If you look at my atachments, you'll see that I have more ports and if you look at the status atachment, you'll see that they are not being added to the iptables.


    WHITE_PORT_OUT="80 443 587 993...
  21. Replies
    1,195
    Views
    486,122

    Re: Moblock (peerguardian linux alternative)

    I was not confused about the differences between TCP and UDP. It was just not working.

    IP whitelisting is [now] working. Before, even though I saw the IP listed with the status command, it was...
  22. Replies
    1,195
    Views
    486,122

    Re: Moblock (peerguardian linux alternative)

    I've attached the blocklist and conf file.
    I can confirm that the LAN is in the blocklist in Bogon and EMC.
    I can confirm that the IP address whitelists are ignored.
  23. Replies
    1,195
    Views
    486,122

    Re: Moblock (peerguardian linux alternative)

    0.8-33 is not in the repository yet.
  24. Replies
    1,195
    Views
    486,122

    Re: Moblock (peerguardian linux alternative)

    My problem is that local network my router is in the BOGON list and my NETWORK is in the EMC List.

    Whitelisting IP addresses DOES NOT WORK.

    I've tried
    "192.168.10.0-192.168.10.255"...
  25. Replies
    1,195
    Views
    486,122

    Re: Moblock (peerguardian linux alternative)

    I need it to not block my router and other computers on my local network. They are in the bogon list.
Results 1 to 25 of 30
Page 1 of 2 1 2