Re: Phatch: New Photo Batch Processor calling for testers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PartisanEntity
The translation into German is progressing too ;)
Great! Any idea when it will be ready?
I've been developping at high speed. A lot of refactoring and also some new features. Right now Phatch supports the following actions: image scaling or downsizing, rotating, mirroring, converting, shadows, rounded corners, watermark, ...
You can watermark your images by an offset, by tiling or scaling. The watermark can have any transparency you want.
I've put some new screenshots in the second post of this thread: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=2796343#2
Re: Phatch: New Photo Batch Processor calling for testers
wow, you are really developing this fast!
Re: Phatch: New Photo Batch Processor calling for testers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
stani
Great! Any idea when it will be ready?
I've been developping at high speed. A lot of refactoring and also some new features. Right now Phatch supports the following actions: image scaling or downsizing, rotating, mirroring, converting, shadows, rounded corners, watermark, ...
You can watermark your images by an offset, by tiling or scaling. The watermark can have any transparency you want.
I've put some new screenshots in the second post of this thread:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=2796343#2
Hi stani,
I must admit that I have not been doing any testing or translating lately, I am a bit swamped time-management wise at the moment.
I will keep you up to date though, I have started translating however I am not far yet, perhaps 20 words at most currently.
However I am very impressed with the work you have put into Phatch, it really is great and I am spreading the news about it.
Cheers :)
Re: Phatch: New Photo Batch Processor calling for testers
Hi,
This looks very promising indeed. Thanks.
How about a renaming mask - ie batch rename by inserting fixed text into the original file name, or the date? This can serve both with other transformation modules and as a standalone function.
HA
Re: Phatch: New Photo Batch Processor calling for testers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
handaxe
How about a renaming mask - ie batch rename by inserting fixed text into the original file name, or the date?
Good suggestion, I was expecting already someone to ask for it. Could you please register a new blueprint 'rename' with some different scenarios/possibilities of what you would like to have implemented?
Do it here: http://www.launchpad.net/phatch
Stani
Re: Phatch: New Photo Batch Processor calling for testers
will do.
Forgot me password (sigh :() and waiting for reset email....
HA
Re: Phatch: New Photo Batch Processor calling for testers
Just to show I have not stopped helping out, I will try to do some translation this weekend.
Re: Phatch: New Photo Batch Processor calling for testers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
stani
Good suggestion, I was expecting already someone to ask for it. Could you please register a new blueprint 'rename' with some different scenarios/possibilities of what you would like to have implemented?
Do it here:
http://www.launchpad.net/phatch
Stani
Done.
HA
Re: Phatch: New Photo Batch Processor calling for testers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PartisanEntity
Just to show I have not stopped helping out, I will try to do some translation this weekend.
Great! Please send me as soon as possible the .po file you have till now. I can upload it than to Rosetta, so more people can collaborate on it:
https://translations.launchpad.net/phatch/
Afterwards you can continue on Rosetta.
Anyone reading this message with a different language than English or Dutch is kindly invited to translate Phatch.
Stani
Re: Phatch: New Photo Batch Processor calling for testers
thanks,you just saved me (actually my dad) a lot of manual work! One little possible feature request - batch file size changes.. maybe through standardising dimensions?
eg:
I had about 50 product images that needed to be formatted for a website. they ranged from ~ 750*450 to about three times that size.
If I could make them all the same dimensions, then apply a quality filter, it would be one-click perfection!
Thanks for the app, it worked excellent here. No bugs to report :)