The Ubuntu Certificate Of Authenticity

[jamieh]

Was bored - Made some Ubuntu "Certificate Of Authenticity"s. Avaliable at:

http://jamieh.ath.cx:8000/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=35

Images are under the Creative Commons license.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ca/

[Mason Whitaker]

That's brilliant! :lol:

[eragon100]

:lolflag::lolflag::lolflag:

[Skripka]

Was bored - Made an Ubuntu "Certificate Of Authenticity"

http://jamieh.ath.cx:8000/ubuntu-coa.png

One small problem: Your serial number isn't long enough,

Windows XP serials are 25 characters long (5X5) , and Adobe serials are 24 characters (6X4) long...also you need a barcode. :)

PS-could you make a Kubuntu one? :popcorn: :lolflag:

[jamieh]

One small problem: Your serial number isn't long enough,

Windows XP serials are 25 characters long (5X5) , and Adobe serials are 24 characters (6X4) long...also you need a barcode. :)

PS-could you make a Kubuntu one? :popcorn: :lolflag:

Thanks for the tips :) I made a collection at http://jamieh.ath.cx:8000/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=35

[cmay]

you should start manufacturing a bunch of ready to use ubuntu computers with this sticker on it. i am sure it will sell. great :)

[stinger30au]

this is one of the funniest threads i have read for a long time round here

keep up the awesome graphics works!

[I-75]

Good post, enjoyed this one!

[wirepuller134]

Yes very funny, and useful.

[red_team316]

Try using the 3of9 barcode font for the actual barcodes :)

[lukjad]

This is definately worth a thank you Button. Are these stickers under a licence?

[jamieh]

Try using the 3of9 barcode font for the actual barcodes :)

Thanks - Uploaded :)

[xpod]

One small problem: Your serial number isn't long enough,

Windows XP serials are 25 characters long (5X5)

Linux is not Windows:wink:

[jamieh]

This is definately worth a thank you Button. Are these stickers under a licence?

(Edited)

Yeah, Creative Commons. More info on OP.

[lukjad]

Lol. All right. I just wanted to know. So, not even the GPL?

[jamieh]

Lol. All right. I just wanted to know. So, not even the GPL?

Yeah I'll say CC
Sorry for the change - I just want to avoid any issues haha :guitar:

[lukjad]

That's fine. You may wish to include that somewhere else, like the OP and the site and/or the pics themselves.

[smartboyathome]

I remember seeing another ubuntu certificate of authenticity around here. they look so similar. ;)

[jamieh]

That's fine. You may wish to include that somewhere else, like the OP and the site and/or the pics themselves.

I put it in the original post. I'll also added to the gallery page.

[jamieh]

I remember seeing another ubuntu certificate of authenticity around here. they look so similar. ;)

What - where?

I got the idea when I was trying to peel the Windows COA off of my now Ubuntu-powered OptiPlex server.

[fatality_uk]

I remember seeing another ubuntu certificate of authenticity around here. they look so similar. ;)

Hmm me too. About a year ago! Sure it about then! Still, nice artwork!!

[jamieh]

Hmm me too. About a year ago! Sure it about then! Still, nice artwork!!

Ah, you mean this? http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=591289
That one's cool too, but it looks like he just copied these (http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/artwork/stickers/kit/fedora_kit_a6.png).

[lukjad]

Yeah I'll say GPLv3.
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html

Sorry for the change - I just want to avoid any issues haha :guitar:
How about the Creative Commons license Share, share alike, noncommercial, or GPL v2?

The reason I say this is because GPLv3 (and 2) require you to give the source code. Like the .xcf file for GIMP. Also, GPLv3 requires you to use only things under the GPLv3 license, even things under the GPLv2 are not admissible. So, if a font was GPLv2... well, you get the idea.

Sorry for confusing you. Just something to look at.

[jamieh]

How about the Creative Commons license Share, share alike, noncommercial, or GPL v2?

The reason I say this is because GPLv3 (and 2) require you to give the source code. Like the .xcf file for GIMP. Also, GPLv3 requires you to use only things under the GPLv3 license, even things under the GPLv2 are not admissible. So, if a font was GPLv2... well, you get the idea.

Sorry for confusing you. Just something to look at.

Switched.
Sorry I'm pretty new to "licenses" and such. I'm usually a pretty informal person.