ShirishAg75
November 16th, 2008, 05:34 PM
Hi all,
I would like to know people's viewpoints (specifically filesystem folks) about the performance and reliability of linux-ntfs vs ntfs-3g.
I read an interesting thread (a mini flame-war) about the two of them at linux-ntfs forum (http://forum.linux-ntfs.org/viewtopic.php?t=741)
From the thread the following differences I could make out
a. Linux-ntfs (some part of it) has been integrated in the kernel.
b. NTFS-3g started life as a fork of linux-ntfs
c. NTFS-3g has been more widely known (I know about this) and perhaps tested as well (Dunno really)
So my questions are :-
a. Does it make sense to install both ntfsprogs as well as ntfs-3g or just use one or the other?
b. Which of the two is more reliable, better maintained and has more features ?
c. Which of the two projects people perceive as making grounds in the near and medium future?
I would like to know people's viewpoints (specifically filesystem folks) about the performance and reliability of linux-ntfs vs ntfs-3g.
I read an interesting thread (a mini flame-war) about the two of them at linux-ntfs forum (http://forum.linux-ntfs.org/viewtopic.php?t=741)
From the thread the following differences I could make out
a. Linux-ntfs (some part of it) has been integrated in the kernel.
b. NTFS-3g started life as a fork of linux-ntfs
c. NTFS-3g has been more widely known (I know about this) and perhaps tested as well (Dunno really)
So my questions are :-
a. Does it make sense to install both ntfsprogs as well as ntfs-3g or just use one or the other?
b. Which of the two is more reliable, better maintained and has more features ?
c. Which of the two projects people perceive as making grounds in the near and medium future?