RossDV8
November 10th, 2008, 09:33 PM
I have been using other Linux distros for more than 10 years and watched them grow and improve. In nearly all popular distributions when you install, you are offered the choice of reusing the existing /home.
I had been so used to this that I could change versions and distros at will. I do major backups from time to time, but there are some things that are a pain to backup. Mozilla settings and Thunderbird mail are two that come to mind.
I installed Ubuntu ages ago and it was running ok, but I saw 8.10 was out so I decided (silly me) to install it without reading the forum.
First thing was I lost my networking. Looked it up on another computer and found a heap of posts on problems so I found 8.04 and installed that instead.
Now. I kept my /home on a separate partition, but if I install Ubuntu and choose to mount that partition as /home It tries to create its own /home and mount my partition as well. It then comes up with an error "cannot enter /home from root" and goes blank.
I edited fstab from a live CD, but the format is different from other Linux distros, so that didn;t work. So I reinstalled using a few options, which didn;t work either.
I spent an entire day and part of the night and it is still not satisfactory. I have saved most of my data - the stuff that was already backed up mostly.
What I lost was about 6 years of emails in Thunderbird, all my Firefox settings (a lot easier fixed than lost mail) and some of my documents, like my phone book text file. (The latest changes since the last major backup)
I have just downloaded a different Linux distribution, one that installs properly.
I hope someone from Ubuntu development reads these forume and can:
Have a look at the way other distributions install.
Modify Ubuntu to look for an existing /home, as others have done for many years.
Set Ubuntu with the option to reuse an existing /home so settings and mail are automatically kept.
To do this, they also have to make sure .mozilla firefox and .mozilla thunderbird in /home are not overwritten.
Almost everyone else can do it (and has done for many years) - why not Ubuntu?
On the distros that keep the existing /home, it doesn;t matter if it is on the root drive or on another partition - they all keep /home intact.
Only Ubuntu destroys data. Yes, I know it warns us to back up, but as I mentioned, it didn't even mount a separate partition as /home. AND, it overwrote my backup files on that partition while it was trying to mount it as /home. (As wella s creating a /home in the root partition)
I know this because I tried to mount another partition as home on a different install and that partition wasn;t available either, but there is now a copy of Ubuntu's /home folders on it!
My other computer is just finishing downloading another distro. One of the beautiful things about Linux. On the other hand, I am not abandoning Ubuntu altogether. I have several computers. Those that are used for non-critical stuff will still run Ubuntu so I can watch it develop. The computers that have important long term data will run other distros.
I simply can't afford to be restoring 100 gigabytes of data whenever I update Ubuntu!
RossD
p.s.
I admire Canonical for sticking to its 6 monthly release cycle, but I don;pt admire them for releasing 8.10 when it is clearly still in beta, with many unresolved bugs.
I had been so used to this that I could change versions and distros at will. I do major backups from time to time, but there are some things that are a pain to backup. Mozilla settings and Thunderbird mail are two that come to mind.
I installed Ubuntu ages ago and it was running ok, but I saw 8.10 was out so I decided (silly me) to install it without reading the forum.
First thing was I lost my networking. Looked it up on another computer and found a heap of posts on problems so I found 8.04 and installed that instead.
Now. I kept my /home on a separate partition, but if I install Ubuntu and choose to mount that partition as /home It tries to create its own /home and mount my partition as well. It then comes up with an error "cannot enter /home from root" and goes blank.
I edited fstab from a live CD, but the format is different from other Linux distros, so that didn;t work. So I reinstalled using a few options, which didn;t work either.
I spent an entire day and part of the night and it is still not satisfactory. I have saved most of my data - the stuff that was already backed up mostly.
What I lost was about 6 years of emails in Thunderbird, all my Firefox settings (a lot easier fixed than lost mail) and some of my documents, like my phone book text file. (The latest changes since the last major backup)
I have just downloaded a different Linux distribution, one that installs properly.
I hope someone from Ubuntu development reads these forume and can:
Have a look at the way other distributions install.
Modify Ubuntu to look for an existing /home, as others have done for many years.
Set Ubuntu with the option to reuse an existing /home so settings and mail are automatically kept.
To do this, they also have to make sure .mozilla firefox and .mozilla thunderbird in /home are not overwritten.
Almost everyone else can do it (and has done for many years) - why not Ubuntu?
On the distros that keep the existing /home, it doesn;t matter if it is on the root drive or on another partition - they all keep /home intact.
Only Ubuntu destroys data. Yes, I know it warns us to back up, but as I mentioned, it didn't even mount a separate partition as /home. AND, it overwrote my backup files on that partition while it was trying to mount it as /home. (As wella s creating a /home in the root partition)
I know this because I tried to mount another partition as home on a different install and that partition wasn;t available either, but there is now a copy of Ubuntu's /home folders on it!
My other computer is just finishing downloading another distro. One of the beautiful things about Linux. On the other hand, I am not abandoning Ubuntu altogether. I have several computers. Those that are used for non-critical stuff will still run Ubuntu so I can watch it develop. The computers that have important long term data will run other distros.
I simply can't afford to be restoring 100 gigabytes of data whenever I update Ubuntu!
RossD
p.s.
I admire Canonical for sticking to its 6 monthly release cycle, but I don;pt admire them for releasing 8.10 when it is clearly still in beta, with many unresolved bugs.