PDA

View Full Version : [SOLVED] Thanking count mismatch



pp.
October 8th, 2008, 07:15 PM
As anyone can see, I have been thanked t times in p posts. However, when I use the link Find all thanked posts by pp in my profile, the query will find but p-1 posts.

Not that I mind being one post shy, but software yielding results which are not obviously consistent always makes me look twice.

lisati
October 8th, 2008, 07:19 PM
I hadn't actually noticed the apparent discrepancy. As long as any posts I've made that might need follow-up show in both the "thanked posts" and "find all posts by..." options, I'm okay....

LaRoza
October 8th, 2008, 07:21 PM
As anyone can see, I have been thanked t times in p posts. However, when I use the link Find all thanked posts by pp in my profile, the query will find but p-1 posts.

Not that I mind being one post shy, but software yielding results which are not obviously consistent always makes me look twice.

Please validate my stats...

It may be that post was moved to the Jail or OPP or something or was deleted for whatever reason and you can't find it.

pp.
October 8th, 2008, 07:39 PM
Please validate my stats...

It may be that post was moved to the Jail or OPP or something or was deleted for whatever reason and you can't find it.

Validating your stats does not yield useful results. The search is limited to 250 posts.

The same query yields 146 posts for lisati but should 151.

LaRoza
October 8th, 2008, 09:08 PM
Next time there is database maintenance, it should be corrected.

pp.
October 8th, 2008, 09:13 PM
Has the cause for the discrepancy been found?

ubuntu-geek
October 8th, 2008, 09:15 PM
Could be a bug, there is a newer version of the thank you software out or it's a database issue. We'll check into it soon.

pp.
October 8th, 2008, 09:16 PM
Ah, I see. Good luck, then.

LaRoza
October 8th, 2008, 09:18 PM
Could be a bug, there is a newer version of the thank you software out or it's a database issue. We'll check into it soon.

Matthew tweaked a setting to remove my errant Thanks (the 1 I supposedly gave) a while ago, but it hasn't been reflected here yet.