HungryMan
September 16th, 2008, 01:41 PM
I know, people around me do it, I do it, chances are you do it.
People only use the free of charge part of open-source. And why shouldn't they? Most are really greedy (or cost-aware) and or have no idea how to compile from source, or even at least understand the source code.
But why should we not take advantage of the generosity of programmers, i mean it does say in about ubuntu:
"Free software" doesn't mean that you shouldn't have to pay for it (although Ubuntu is committed to being free of charge as well); it means that you should be able to use the software in any way you wish: the code that makes up free software is available for anyone to download, change, fix, and use in any way. Alongside ideological benefits, this freedom also has technical advantages: when programs are developed, the hard work of others can be used and built upon. With non-free software, this cannot happen and when programs are developed, they have to start from scratch. For this reason the development of free software is fast, efficient and exciting!
And i totally agree with that. You can should be able to do anything with software, Come on! Commercializing software is kinda foolish to me. If it's proprietary, somehow, somewhere, somebody is already pirating it. Software is not made of gold, it's just data. It's very easy to duplicate. And I've seen software companies ripping off other software companies. A lot of $30 video converters look and feel and even function the same with only the branding as difference!
And if people reason that other people might take credit for your work if it's not proprietary, then I :lolflag: at them! What if they claim it's theirs, and somehow close source it. It's happened before, look at wine! it's still alive you know.
anyway, at least i got this issue off my chest.
People only use the free of charge part of open-source. And why shouldn't they? Most are really greedy (or cost-aware) and or have no idea how to compile from source, or even at least understand the source code.
But why should we not take advantage of the generosity of programmers, i mean it does say in about ubuntu:
"Free software" doesn't mean that you shouldn't have to pay for it (although Ubuntu is committed to being free of charge as well); it means that you should be able to use the software in any way you wish: the code that makes up free software is available for anyone to download, change, fix, and use in any way. Alongside ideological benefits, this freedom also has technical advantages: when programs are developed, the hard work of others can be used and built upon. With non-free software, this cannot happen and when programs are developed, they have to start from scratch. For this reason the development of free software is fast, efficient and exciting!
And i totally agree with that. You can should be able to do anything with software, Come on! Commercializing software is kinda foolish to me. If it's proprietary, somehow, somewhere, somebody is already pirating it. Software is not made of gold, it's just data. It's very easy to duplicate. And I've seen software companies ripping off other software companies. A lot of $30 video converters look and feel and even function the same with only the branding as difference!
And if people reason that other people might take credit for your work if it's not proprietary, then I :lolflag: at them! What if they claim it's theirs, and somehow close source it. It's happened before, look at wine! it's still alive you know.
anyway, at least i got this issue off my chest.