PDA

View Full Version : Earth, Sky Intrepid Colors



Afoot
July 11th, 2008, 10:16 AM
I think the darker brown and the orange don't go well together. Something that looks nicer is brown and blue. Take a look.

http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/1308/blue1vz2.th.png (http://img133.imageshack.us/my.php?image=blue1vz2.png)

Original.

http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/4215/209360eq4.th.png (http://img133.imageshack.us/my.php?image=209360eq4.png)

aimran
July 11th, 2008, 12:42 PM
Class!

linuxisfree
July 11th, 2008, 12:45 PM
Yes, i agree. Something about THAT combination of blue and brown seems just right.:D

Masoris
July 11th, 2008, 03:56 PM
I think the darker brown and the orange don't go well together. Something that looks nicer is brown and blue. Take a look.

http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/1308/blue1vz2.th.png (http://img133.imageshack.us/my.php?image=blue1vz2.png)

Original.

http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/4215/209360eq4.th.png (http://img133.imageshack.us/my.php?image=209360eq4.png)

Yes. You're right. But I still don't like intrepid default theme. Blue theme and brown wallpaper is better than it.

madjr
July 11th, 2008, 05:03 PM
I think the darker brown and the orange don't go well together. Something that looks nicer is brown and blue. Take a look.

http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/1308/blue1vz2.th.png (http://img133.imageshack.us/my.php?image=blue1vz2.png)

Original.

http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/4215/209360eq4.th.png (http://img133.imageshack.us/my.php?image=209360eq4.png)


you could say that it looks now more like ubuntu studio

dizee
July 11th, 2008, 05:11 PM
the problem with blue is that everyone uses it. it doesn't give ubuntu a unique identity.

aaaantoine
July 11th, 2008, 05:36 PM
I'm gonna have to go ahead and say I don't like either one.

The grey panels really bug me. They remind me of some old DOS-based non-windows GUIs. Actually, it kinda reminds me of Cinelerra... and Cinelerra's default skin is hideous.

Completely unrelated, I wonder if the Gnome devs have ever thought about adding a Gradient option for coloring the panels.

VitaLiNux
July 11th, 2008, 05:54 PM
the problem with blue is that everyone uses it. it doesn't give ubuntu a unique identity.
I agree!

MaxIBoy
July 11th, 2008, 05:59 PM
Completely unrelated, I wonder if the Gnome devs have ever thought about adding a Gradient option for coloring the panels.

I've wanted that for a while. But what I want even more is an animated texture for window borders and panels. It would make the fire-ification of my interface complete!

Afoot
July 12th, 2008, 02:35 AM
the problem with blue is that everyone uses it. it doesn't give ubuntu a unique identity.
The blue would just be accompanying the main color, brown. :)

Nessa
July 12th, 2008, 02:42 AM
All the nice colors are already taken though.

amazingtaters
July 12th, 2008, 03:11 AM
I think the colours of Ubuntu are nice. I prefer the orange tones over the brown, but overall I think it is a solid and unique combination. What's really the matter with that theme is the dark grey everywhere. It's just awful. So many different kinds of ugly. What it really needs is lighter panels, an off white or perhaps something semi-transparent. All I know is, I will be changing the theme straight back to my current custom setup asap when I move to Intrepid come early August.

Mr. Picklesworth
July 12th, 2008, 03:18 AM
I still stand by my white / light grey with occasional orange highlights. Highlight colours on anything that doesn't require the user's attention, however, is simply a bad idea.

Calmeida
July 12th, 2008, 04:03 AM
I cant say I prefer the blue one either really.

I hated and hate the brownish/orange world, but I have come to learn to live with adaptations of it for pure principle. In short, I want a OS to look as "standard" as possible. Sadly, Ubuntu is so ugly I cant accept to maintain the original appearance and feel forced to make a few changes here and there to be able to live with it at all.

To sum it all up, the Ubuntuteam lies years behind when it comes to the esthetical parts of a OS. Years! And what we've seen from the Intrepid changes so far, they are not making any major progress in that field.

Good thing they have other strong sides so we can keep loving it.

Superkoop
July 12th, 2008, 04:08 AM
the problem with blue is that everyone uses it. it doesn't give ubuntu a unique identity.

If making Ubuntu more unique, is more important than making it look good, somebody needs some sense smacked into them.

Good looks > uniqueness

acelin
July 12th, 2008, 05:16 AM
Grr this isnt brown, its me of a flat ash color, and it is horrible.

acelin
July 12th, 2008, 05:19 AM
All the nice colors are already taken though.

Except for white.

Mac=Grey

Windows= Gray/Blue

Ubuntu= its off white with orange stuff.

Ubuntu with white=beautiful and heavenly.

Saint Angeles
July 12th, 2008, 06:00 AM
Intrepid could have like, 4 default themes:

Fire - Red, Orange, Yellow
Water - Dark Blue, Teal
Earth - Brown, Green
Wind - White, Blue

is this a good idea?

Afoot
July 12th, 2008, 11:58 AM
Except for white.

Mac=Grey

Windows= Gray/Blue

Ubuntu= its off white with orange stuff.

Ubuntu with white=beautiful and heavenly.
White is too bright...

mcduck
July 12th, 2008, 01:09 PM
Completely unrelated, I wonder if the Gnome devs have ever thought about adding a Gradient option for coloring the panels.

Actually they have included option to use whatever graphics you want in your panels, including transparent or partially transparent images. ;)

If you want a gradient in your panel it takes about 2 minutes with Gimp or Inkscape to create one, then you can just drag&drop it into the panel..

Anyway, that particular blue does indeed work well with the II theme, but I'd presonally rather stay away from anything that resembles the blue&grey theme used in Windows since the times of 3.1,a and in all OS X versions. I can hardly imagine any color combination that would be more boring.. :D

acelin
July 12th, 2008, 04:35 PM
Nah bro. It looks beautiful if done right. You dont make it perfectly white, and excessively use gradients.